evidence to require the to allow the inspector general to forward that document to to the to congress. i mean, to the i m sorry to the justice department. and say that they re to consider prosecution. when you don t go forward, in that case, you better have a pretty good explanation. because otherwise, it does suggest favoritism, and what does it say to the other 80% of americans who are concerned about seeing that justice is done for people who commit crimes in high places? yeah. and i think that the both of these yeah both both of these. i mean, i think the the reality is the gravity that pulls on all this is the political capital donald spoke to and that s unfortunate from a justice perspective i think has been very warping in the past and we will see if that continues to be the case. donald and elizabeth, thank you both. that was great. don t go anywhere. my interview with congressman james clyburn, third highest ranking democrat in the house,
powerful woman in government not have said thanks, guys, the seven of you, i hear you, they said they are going to release the transcript let s see what it says and then he wouldn t already be on the road to impeachment. juan: what happened with mueller? dana: nothing. juan: bill barr comes out and says no obstruction, no collusion. he steers the whole narrative and conversation in the country as a spin effort to protect donald trump. jesse: there wasn t any spin. juan: oh yeah there is evidence, they decided not to indict on the basis of the evidence or the contacts between the russians or they left open obstruction to the justice department because of a policy memo that said you can t indict a sitting president. katie: that s not true. juan: that s different. jesse: that s not true. juan: that s why speaking to dana here. nancy pelosi said bill barr and the justice department say no, you don t have to release this. don t go forward. we have questions about what th
tape over and over again, videotape done by young man mr. orter and tape the choking of your son and audibly hearing him say 10 times i can t breathe and sitting next to you, we had to take you out several times. as a mother, that is fighting for justice in the courts, the local prosecutor wouldn t prosecute, now the federal government on the eve of the fifth anniversary, william barr says no, don t go forward. all that s left for you to get him fired and waiting on the police commissioner s decision. on the human side as a mother that watched this on tape, because we ve gone to cases where the police misconduct, there was no tape and got some guilty verdicts and we were willing to go whatever way the evidence goes but as a mother watching that, tell our viewers how you felt and how you feel. well, it was very disturbing
have all kind of muddled through it what we know as the mueller report. that s a great question. that s what really gets to the heart of what impeachment is supposed to be about. the framers put it in the house of representatives. not in the court, not in independent prosecutorial force but in the house of representatives. that does suggest that politics does play a part. it s not a judicial thing per se. the president doesn t have to break a specific law to be found guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors. it s not unreasonable for the house democrats to say let s not go forward if we re not able to sway a sizable number of the public and include people of the opposite party. one thing we have learned unless it s bipartisan, it doesn t work. only 37% in one poll of the american public supports the idea of impeachment at this point. having said that, there are consequences if they don t go forward. the consequences are do we set a precedent and say the things
work. only 37% in one poll of the american public supports the idea of impeachment at this point. having said that, there are consequences if they don t go forward. the consequences are do we set a precedent and say the things he s been accused of if he were to be found guilty of them do not con constitute impeachable offenses. there are consequences either way. in the short term political consequence and there s the long term sort of like governance consequence. i don t know where that will fall but that s what s going through the minds of a lot of people in congress now. great thanks to our big three for starting us off on a tuesday night. we really appreciate it. coming up, a democratic member of the house judiciary committee is standing by to take our questions on this delicate balance between subpoenas and no shows and angry letters and