Responsive letter saying i approve if you look at the plans that were in 2002 the date of the letters im talking about ill see that the plans submitted then are do not interfere at all with the windows of she had antenna active ear window blockage would not have been a concern i want you to know collateral to this appeal other concerns are water leakage. The other question where this window exists is there a tenant. At this time it was a tenant and the tenant didnt have concerns. Thats correct thats my understanding. Okay. Well hear from the permit holders council now. Madam president and members of the board of panel im joseph i represent the residents in this action first, id like to respond there is no tenant in that window that is a hallway window a third year hallway with that said, window of a rental noted blocking any tenants verify whatsoever and ive been advised by the architect and contractors that Property Line windows dont have rights of use my clients chuck and carol live
Tenant. At this time it was a tenant and the tenant didnt have concerns. Thats correct thats my understanding. Okay. Well hear from the permit holders council now. Madam president and members of the board of panel im joseph i represent the residents in this action first, id like to respond there is no tenant in that window that is a hallway window a third year hallway with that said, window of a rental noted blocking any tenants verify whatsoever and ive been advised by the architect and contractors that Property Line windows dont have rights of use my clients chuck and carol live on pine street the appellants stated the neighboring rental building and in 2002, the clients another bathroom and deck they got approval from their neighbor and they got approval from the city and the work was regularly inspected we invading made exhibits to our brief that shows all those things to be true and the building was regularly inspected. 12 or 13 years later she complained to the city the city foun
Flashing along the edge the new drawings to the notice of violation doesnt have a demolition plan no nailing schedule formal the roof sheet or no mention of the flashing between the buildings i think that all of those should be included in the drawings for the project as if they intend to lower the roof. Thank you. Your time is up. So if you could fill out a speaking theyre on the podium and commissioner Vice President honda. Navy maybe the architect or counselor can answer one of the briefs when the most of the work occurred in 2000. 2002. Is there a reason it took until 2015 for this i didnt conduct my investigation until 2014. Maybe the counselor can answer the question and im sorry speak into the microphone. My client was not tentative point one and two a copy of the letter to her asking her to consent a further of a copy of a responsive letter saying i approve if you look at the plans that were in 2002 the date of the letters im talking about ill see that the plans submitted then
Advice and mr. Pacheco and mr. Alec our Legal Process clerk and Cynthia Goldstein the boards executive director also joined by representatives that have cases before the board jav us the enforcement enforcement and Legal Affairs Management Division of taxis and assessable services and be joined by Scott Sanchez that represents the Planning Department and Planning Commission and senior building inspector at this time mr. Pacheco go over the guidelines and will conduct the swearing in process. Please be advised the ringing of and use of cell phones and other Electronic Devices are prohibited. Out in the hallway. Permit holders and others have up to 7 minutes to present their case and 3 minutes for rebuttal. People affiliated with these parties must conclude their comments within 7 minutes, participants not affiliated have up to 3 minutes no rebuttal. To assist the board in the accurate preparation of the minutes, members of the public are asked, not required to submit a speaker card or B
Permit holders and others have up to 7 minutes to present their case and 3 minutes for rebuttal. People affiliated with these parties must conclude their comments within 7 minutes, participants not affiliated have up to 3 minutes no rebuttal. To assist the board in the accurate preparation of the minutes, members of the public are asked, not required to submit a speaker card or Business Card to the clerk. If you have a question about the schedule, speak to the staff after the meeting or call the board office tomorrow we are located at 1650 Mission Street, suite 304. This meeting is broadcast live on sfgovtv cable channel 78. Dvds are available to purchase directly from sfgovtv. Thank you for your attention. Well conduct our swearing in process. If you intend to testify and wish to have the board give your testimony evidentiary weight, please stand and say i do. Please note any of the members may speak without taking the oath pursuant to the sunshine ordinance, and thank you. Do you sol