did that. that during the 14th about it last night as gates was an opponent of mr. mccarthy. lawmakers you can see stepping in to prevent a scuffle on the floor of the house. we will ask washington examiner if that might be a preview of more inviting to come and they wondered 18th congress, hello everyone this is fox s live i am eric shawn. hi arthel. arthel: hi everyone i am arthel neville but two other major stories we are following this hour, president biden prepares to visit the southern border for the first time tomorrow, former border patrol chief rodney scott on that he is ahead. at first law enforcement removing two mattresses that may have been blood stained from the home were fort university of idaho students were brutally murdered. this, as we learn more about how investigators track the suspect in the weeks leading up to his arrest. former d.c. homicide detective ted williams is just moments away from the crime scene and idaho. but first, chief correspondent jonat
Responsive letter saying i approve if you look at the plans that were in 2002 the date of the letters im talking about ill see that the plans submitted then are do not interfere at all with the windows of she had antenna active ear window blockage would not have been a concern i want you to know collateral to this appeal other concerns are water leakage. The other question where this window exists is there a tenant. At this time it was a tenant and the tenant didnt have concerns. Thats correct thats my understanding. Okay. Well hear from the permit holders council now. Madam president and members of the board of panel im joseph i represent the residents in this action first, id like to respond there is no tenant in that window that is a hallway window a third year hallway with that said, window of a rental noted blocking any tenants verify whatsoever and ive been advised by the architect and contractors that Property Line windows dont have rights of use my clients chuck and carol live
Okay, back from recess and madam clerk can f you could call item 5. Motionordsering submitted to the voters [inaudible] renewable Green House Gas energy to provide information regarding leckric power and [inaudible] election to be held november three, 2015 this is for the November Ballot and called the Korean Energy right to know act. It does 2 things, sets a clear definition what we mean by clean energy consistent with state law and lets the public know how much electricity comes either pg and e or clean pow r3 4 f1er using clean, green renewable we are consistent with the Legal Definition in state law. The ballot misher will informerate payers how much of electricity is coming from Nuclear Power. When san franciscan choose their Energy Provider we can make a informed choice about where the electricity comes from. We know all most a quarter of pg and e lickticity comes from Nuclear Power plant. This shows pge and e is committed to Nuclear Power. Today we have a technical amendment to
Pge. That is just ridiculous and think pge alleys putting this forward should think about what it makes them look to the public. Let me get to the other important aspect of the ordinance ballot measure and that schnookler issue. I have done work on clean power sf for 11 year jz a big part is knocking on door squz calling people on the phone and i explained this to thousands of people and the number 1 comment and get from people i have to convince is, i got the thing from pge and see in their advertising that they are the greenest utility in the country because they have over 50 percent Green House Gas free electricity. The reason that pge is able to get away with that is they claim Nuclear Power is Green House Gas free and clean. Green house gas free it isnt true. Anyone who knows the Energy Industry knows that a Nuclear Power plant because [inaudible] a lot of other inputs, even given Nuclear Power plant produces from 15 percent up to fifen 0 percent of Green House Gas emissions over
As close as they can in real time. We do that by arranging the energy with the grid operator. The idea of firming and shape sg you produce a specific amountf Renewable Energy and that energy is delivered into the grid but you can using all the resources in the grid shape it . Into a profile that supports your consumers demand. The same amount of Renewable Energy is produced from that product as from the product content in category one product and the product conitant cat tent 3. Renewable yeents are merely documentation that a given amount of Renewable Energy is generated and delivered to the grid. Okay. So, then just going back to my question, for category 3 that is the only category where potentially we would go outside of the state unless it is on the boarder and delivered within california but that is the category where potentially we could purchase Renewable Energy credits . The category 3 are sort of the most liquid, they are the most easily traded. It doesnt have to be a out of