nothing. we ae over hav thirty one trillion dollars in debt and that massiv$3e tally continues to grow even afters bi this bill . stillll, small government economists, people like steve moore support the bill calling it a step in the rightir direction. republican congressmen, on the other hand , chip roy is referring to it as at sandwich. the washington times, meanwhile, they describe it as a win for the gop, all whiles representing nancy mace, is trashing the deal for normalizing record spendingt wh with the president who can t find his pants. now,ca some republican lawmaker, they are infuriated thatth the compromise maintains what h an unacceptably high level of covid error olef spending and repurpose nearly one hundred billion dollars in spending instead of making poi outright cuts to thent budget. u this is a bill that pushes any further negotiations back until after the presidential election, which is a very keyy point of contentioken. t to many republicans wanted yet an
. yo promisesed d to reiton in the abuses of those in power to take your liberty, your propert p y, your reputation d ,and indeed your life,ee he promised humility that is so often found when the powerful embrace fairness as their sur foundation. gar sure doesn t seem that way, does it? gary shapleighy , as hisiservisy supervisor, special agent for the irs, where he s worked for 14 years in january twenty twenty , he was assigned to what he calls a high profile investigation. who s the subject of the investigation? can ti can t confirm or deny the subject to this investigation. why not?t of t because, you knohew, part of the tax secrecy laws don t allow it. shapleigh can t say it. but cbs news has learnede prob the investigation was the probe of hunter biden by thee by the trump appointed u.s. attorney in delaware. cbs news has obtained this o letter shanley s lawyers sen t to congress monday alleging irregularity in dogs handling of the investigation. shapleigh is seek
be stronger coming out of this and continuing to cut oute the irs agents or will it be legal? n i m told, by the wayum, that a number of democrats are so shaken by the cut in domesticco discretionary spendingin that they re talking about taking sway 20 or 30 billion dollar th the irs money to to put it to other priorities. that they think are a lot more important. so i think you ve got to be you know, there are a lot of details here, and i think eachto whde has a different version of what the details mean. but i would suggest to you that each of these steps, as small as they are, are it n fact stepy away from bigger spending. you ve had the new york post, a the wall street journal, i mean ,hardly left wing institutions . both have said this is anificant significant step in the right direction. e te they have technical experts, act least as good as congressman bishop. and they have looked a t it and they ve concludey d thats a
judgment by yet another company that st anothe been hijacked byi wingers at its corporate headquarters. you know, you ve c seen thisltan before with delta and coca-cola when they attackeden the georgia election law. the los angeles dodgerslaw, recently currying favor with a radical anti catholic organization and now target. you think all these fancy ceos with their multimillion dollar th and their vast array of advisors would have a much as much common sense as a twenty something basketball player did when michael jordan said republicansl buy sneakers as well.n sot target shouldn t be surprised. they ve seen millionthey ve s de drop off their market cap.tinues they shouldn t be surprised. that continues b because they ve been attempting to market trans clothing and other items directly to children contrary to their owntheims claims. and of course, parents don t appreciate it all. i don t know of anyone that let doesn t like tom cotton, but let s assume hypothetically that there is s