Whats night, Jack Smith looks to Pierce Donald trumps immunity shield. Ill take you the president should be agnostic to who is going to occupy the office next. Right. So it arguably, and i think a very strong argument shouldnt matter, that the president or that the candidate is out advocating for a certain position. Right thats not an official role. The president i think thats what Jack Smith is really trying to get to here, is that this is Candidate Trump. These are candidate actions. Its the president of the senate. Its not the Vice President pence. And thats important because the president of the senate is actually an article one title. So thats thats congress. Its not the Executive Branch. In article two. So you see these differentiations in there. Another key differentiator that i think gets around on those supreme Court Court cases, the Fisher Case. And if you see in this indictment in the Fisher Case was about an obstruction of official proceeding, you see mention of, you know,
Premise of the question, yes, google was Hiding Information from its users, he effectively conceded. It was for their own good. According to feinberg, google didnt want to lead people down pathways that we would not find to be authoritative information. Authoritative information. Youve heard that phrase a lot in the last year. Authoritative information is the opposite of misinformation, or disinformation, or worse, a conspiracy theory. Its really important. All you are allowed to see is authoritative information. Its worth knowing and this and many other cases, what is it . In this case, where did google get the authoritative information . In this case, they got that information from a group led by a noted man of science, the name sounds familiar, he almost singlehandedly stopped all public speculation about the lab leak early in the pandemic. They did this in one swoop by organizing a letter to the land, standing as a known fact, there was no possibility of this virus, the coronavirus
Premise of the question, yes, google was Hiding Information from its users, he effectively conceded. It was for their own good. According to feinberg, google didnt want to lead people down pathways that we would not find to be authoritative information. Authoritative information. Youve heard that phrase a lot in the last year. Authoritative information is the opposite of misinformation, or disinformation, or worse, a conspiracy theory. Its really important. All you are allowed to see is authoritative information. Its worth knowing and this and many other cases, what is it . In this case, where did google get the authoritative information . In this case, they got that information from a group led by a noted man of science, the name sounds familiar, he almost singlehandedly stopped all public speculation about the lab leak early in the pandemic. They did this in one swoop by organizing a letter to the land, standing as a known fact, there was no possibility of this virus, the coronavirus
Premise of the question, yes google was Hiding Informationhe from its users, he effectively conceded. It was for their own good. According to feinberg, google didnt want to lead people down pathways that we would not find to be authoritative information. Authoritative information. Youve heard that phrase a lot in the last year. Authoritative information is the opposite of misinformation, or disinformation, or worse, a conspiracy theory. Its really important. All you are allowed to see is authoritative information. Its worth knowing in this and many w other cases, what is it . In this case, where did google get the authoritative information . In this case, they got that information from a group led byo a noted man of science, the nama sounds familiar, he almost singlehandedly stopped all public speculation about the lab leak early in the pandemic. He did this in one swoop bye organizing a letter to the Land Standing as a known fact, there was no possibility of this virus, the coronaviru
. yo promisesed d to reiton in the abuses of those in power to take your liberty, your propert p y, your reputation d ,and indeed your life,ee he promised humility that is so often found when the powerful embrace fairness as their sur foundation. gar sure doesn t seem that way, does it? gary shapleighy , as hisiservisy supervisor, special agent for the irs, where he s worked for 14 years in january twenty twenty , he was assigned to what he calls a high profile investigation. who s the subject of the investigation? can ti can t confirm or deny the subject to this investigation. why not?t of t because, you knohew, part of the tax secrecy laws don t allow it. shapleigh can t say it. but cbs news has learnede prob the investigation was the probe of hunter biden by thee by the trump appointed u.s. attorney in delaware. cbs news has obtained this o letter shanley s lawyers sen t to congress monday alleging irregularity in dogs handling of the investigation. shapleigh is seek