speaks about a so-called judge, you don t think that s demeaning and threatening and scary in terms of the independence of our jewish douchely? judiciary? that s never happened before. i m telling you, where s the source? he goes after the judiciary. if that doesn t scare people, i mean, he goes after the acting attorney general. he goes after a judge in the trump university case and suggests that he s incompetent because he has mexican heritage. okay, that s during the election. people are still mad about that. i get that. now the president of the united states, these things will go through the legal channels. debate the substance of these issues, the substantive debate, i think, are lacking. we re talking about ivanka s shoe line that s not the resistors, that was kellyanne coming on fox and saying go buy ivanka s that s not right. [inaudible conversations] desire to debate the substance of the issue. oh, really? i really do.
i retain more research on a more charismatic. something like that will happen at some point. it s optimistic, they say robots come bearing coffee and we should welcome the artificial brethren. peter welcomes that. but emerging technology specialist john hayden says we should not welcome the new robot overlords. humans have finite capabilities. we can only work 60 or 70 hours per week are we going to choose human workers or machines? that doesn t scare people the robots are better. i have a lot of other people do it could have nothing to do. at something that a lot of
i retain more research on a more charismatic. something like that will happen at some point. it s optimistic, they say robots come bearing coffee and we should welcome the artificial brethren. peter welcomes that. but emerging technology specialist john hayden says we should not welcome the new robot overlords. humans have finite capabilities. we can only work 60 or 70 hours per week are we going to choose human workers or machines? that doesn t scare people the robots are better. i have a lot of other people do it could have nothing to do. at something that a lot of
would you give a vote on the senate? would you let the senate vote on background checks? i think if harry reid wants a vote, they re going to get a vote. i think they will get a vote on background checks. i think it was unwise to go for assault weapons. are they going to get 60 votes to break the filibuster? pat toomey wants to get something done. something modest that doesn t scare people. i m watching toomey. i know you are. because i think we ve been talking to our producers, it s really tricky where he stands. is he going to back gun safety in a state that s pro-gun like pennsylvania or not? i think they re going to ultimately get some sort of modest deal on gun safety. let me say, the rest of your question. on the budget i think he needs to leads on entitlement reform. he s done it. that s the start of the process.
on everything? do they actually win if we get no gun safety? the republicans win if we get no immigration reform or no deal on the budget. do they win with three losses for the country? i don t think so. your question is a good one. here s how i look at it. on gun control, it s easy for the republicans to oppose obama. it s not so easy for republicans to oppose the parents. so i think on gun control, h he has to step back and let the parents of those kids, and i feel for those parents so desperately, that that s how you get would you give a vote on the senate? would you let the senate vote on background checks? i think if harry reid wants a vote, they re going to get a vote. i think they will get a vote on background checks. i think it was unwise to go for assault weapons. are they going to get 60 votes to break the filibuster? pat toomey wants to get something done. something modest that doesn t scare people. i m watching toomey. i know you are. because i think we ve