pulitzer prize winning david fahrenthold will be here tonight with another jaw-dropping scoop in what has now been a couple of years of jaw-dropping scoops from david fahrenthold, particularly about this president and the president s business record. what s always amazing about david fahrenthold s series of scoops about president trump and bad behavior and misbehavior in the president s business is that whatever david fahrenthold newly reports about them, whatever it is, and there have been a long series of these stories, whatever it is, the president s business, the president s family, the white house itself, they never have anything to say about it. they are always completely blindsided, they always have had no clue as to what it is that david fahrenthold is about to report about them next. well, david fahrenthold will be with us here live tonight to talk about his latest scoop, which, again, both the trump white house and the trump organization appear to have no response to whatsoev
violence, finding them out, and through these lawsuits, disrupting them as organizations, particularly bankrupting them as organizations. it s a really interesting tactic right now, in large part because it doesn t depend on donald trump s justice department doing the right thing about these kinds of crimes and this kind of organized terrorism. and as we head into this weekend and this anniversary, i think it s worth noting that these types of cases are really on a roll right now. it s not just the charlottesville case, where they got that bang up order just today from that federal judge. it s also a new ruling today from a different federal judge involving the country s most long-standing and frankly most putrid online neo-nazi gathering place. it s a website called the daily stormer. it s named as an homage from a nazi newspaper from the third reich. you might have heard over the last couple of months that the daily stormer has been on the receiving end of some really
but that idea that she expressed in response to that question, that the president actually could do something here, that he could help, that he could redress some of what s wrong, that he could apologize for his hurtful words, that he could take them back, that he could say he knows those words are wrong and that they cause harm and here s why i know they re wrong and here s why i take them back, i mean, that is not a huge and unimaginable thing to ask for from a national leader at a time like this. especially if you re in a position of moral if you re in the kind of moral position that the congresswoman from el paso is in after what just happened in her town. and i don t know that congresswoman escobar expects that from president trump, you know, that he ll, you know, take back the things he said about el paso. that he ll take back the things he said against immigrants. but this weekend, on the anniversary of charlottesville, on the two-year anniversary of charlottesville, on the on
immigrants. the way he has talked about people from mexico in particular. the way he has talked about border communities, including el paso. she was asked to explain why she thought, given the president s remarks of those kinds, he shouldn t come to el paso after the shooting. but that idea that she expressed in response to that question, that the president actually could do something here, that he could help, that he could redress some of what s wrong, that he could apologize for his hurtful words, that he could take them back, that he could say he knows those words are wrong and that they cause harm and here s why i know they re wrong and here s why i take them back, i mean, that is not a huge and unimaginable thing to ask for from a national leader at a time like this. especially if you re in a position of moral if you re in the kind of moral position that the congresswoman from el paso is in after what just happened in her town. and i don t know that congresswoman escobar expects
got that bang up order just today from that federal judge. it s also a new ruling today from a different federal judge involving the country s most long-standing and frankly most putrid online neo-nazi gathering place. it s a website called the daily stormer. it s named as an homage from a nazi newspaper from the third reich. you might have heard over the last couple of months that the daily stormer has been on the receiving end of some really expensive lightning bolts thrown at them in court by some of their past victims. in june, it was comedian and commentator dean obeidallah. a couple of years ago, dean obeidallah had written a column for the daily beast in which he had described a bunch of murders that had been committed in the first year of donald trump s protest by killers who had expressed white supremacist beliefs or motives. the column said in part, quote, trump refuses to call these acts what they are, white supremacist terrorism. well, the neo-nazis at the daily stormer, a