Flynn is a defendant without a prosecutor and litigation now without any controversy between the actual parties to the case. Instead of promptly granting dismissal as required as a matter of law, judge sullivan denied two defense motioning opposing any amicus at all, appointed mr. Gleeson to usurp the job of prosecutor, and went forth to right theening wrotes he perceived. To right the wrongs he perceived. The job of the United States attorney is otherwise occupied. In adding these unconstitutional burdens of process to punish Michael Flynn, judge sullivan discarded any semblance of the unbiased, impartial adjudicator this court extolled in the 2019 chapter of that case saga. As a cornerstone of any system of justice worth the label. Four rulings are required to conclude this novel article three excess. Judge sullivans petition for rehearing must be flatly denied with clear language that a judge has no injury and no standing to seek relief of this courts rulings. Because judge sullivan
The washington journal this morning. We send you over to live coverage of the d. C. Circuit court of appeals. [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. Visit ncicap. Org] [captions Copyright National cable satellite corp. 2020] these adding unconstitutional burdens of process to punish michael flynn, judge sullivan discarded any semblance of an impartial adjudicator that he had been extolled. As the cornerstone of any system of justice worth the label. Four rulings are required to conclude this article. The judges position must be flatly denied with clear language the judge has no standing to seek relief in this because hee ruling has invested himself in his prosecution of general flynn, there is now a glaring appearance of bias to millions of citizens. Requires the vacation of and forth, they must compel the District Court to grant the dismissal as a matter of law. Only department of justice can decide the Pu
Watch live coverage of house rules tuesday at 11 00 a. M. Eastern on cspan3. Watch online at cspan. Org impeachment, or listen live with the cspan radio at. The fourth circle Circuit Court of appeals listened to arguments, which bars president s from receiving gifts from foreign governments while in office. The president illegally profited from dignitaries staying at the trump hotel. A threejudge Panel Previously found the district in maryland did not have standing to bring these lawsuits. The courts decision will determine whether the lawsuit can move forward. Oh yay, oh yay. The court is now sitting. God save the note states in the United States in this Honorable Court. The District Court committed multiple errors in refusing to dismiss this suit and plaintiffs can i ask you to speak up just a little bit . Bring the microphone a little closer if you can. And the plaintiffs are fundamentally mistaken in asserting that this court is powerless to correct any of those errors at this time
Were proud to represent Melissa Zarda and bill moore, the executors of the zarda estate and we ask the court to construe and unite title vii with life as we live it and under the plain language and its interpretations. We ask that you find that Sexual Orientation discrimination is sex discrimination under title vii. Don zarda was a male. He was known as guy, though he was not traditionally feminine, but he was a great sky diver. When a customer complained that he identified himself as gay, he was fired and for that revelation, it was a violation of the statute because his sex, a male who was attracted to other men was a motivating factor in the adverse action. And in this case he identified as gay only because he was accused of being straight. And he was proud of being gay, and in the male workplace of the skydiving community, jokes were often made that loose end the tension of the experience and jokes were often sexual. Is his claim that is he alleging that he was fired because he was
Each side has been assigned 30 minutes, 10 minutes per person. Well hear from mr. Antolito. Good amp, your hor nor. Id like to introduce my cocounsel who worked with me on this case. Were proud to represent Melissa Zarda and bill moore, the executors of they have zarda estate. We ask the court to construe title 7 with life as we live it and under the plain language in its interpretations. We ask that you find that Sexual Orientation discrimination is sex discrimination under title 7 00. Don zarda was a male. He was known as gay though he was not traditionally feminine. He was a great sky diver. When a customer complained that he identified himself as gay, he was fired. And for that revelation, a violation of statute because his sex, a male who is attracted to other men, was a motivating factor in the adverse action. And in this case, he identified as gay only because he was accused of being straight. And he was proud of being gay and in the male workplace of the sky diving community, j