Have you heard of the Rosemary Woods stretch . It is named after this woman, Rosemary Woods. The longtime secretary of richard nixon. Woods became her career with nixon in 1950, went long before his time with the white house. She was so close to the family the nixons daughters referred to her as aunt rose. In 1974, route woods was thrust into the National Spotlight during the watergate scandal when investigators discovered a Mysterious 18 and a half gap on one of the tapes handed over from the nixon white house. The tape was believed to contain a conversation between president nixon and his Chief Of Staff three days after the watergate breakin. Woods took responsibility for that gap. She tried to explain it away as an accident. As she tells, it she was simply transcribing the tape at her desk when the phone rang. As she reached for the phone, she mistakenly struck the wrong key on the recorder while her foot was on the machines pedal. The motion ended up somehow destroying the tapes co
it may very well be that mark meadows has entered into a contractual agreement with the government to become a co-operator. maybe he has not entered his guilty plea yet, maybe he has. i still find it very curious that we do not have any marquee names that have flipped. that is unusual it. leads me to conclude the perhaps, jack smith is keeping his powder dry and we are going to see a sizeable january 6th indictment very soon. i still find it a curiosity. it would be phenomenal if mark meadows has done that. former white house chief of staff, certainly no diet coke aid, he is a big deal. david, last word to you. when it comes to election interference, when it comes to the 16 case, we talked about this in the abstract. democracy, overturning elections. we cannot forget that the reason we are here is because donald trump and one of the charges we believe might come up against him, he talks about in the target letter. the deprivation of rights. donald trump and his campaign did not want
i hope that he hears the rumble of the ongoing apparently already posting that i did not tell anybody to delete a server. what he s done is called the oliveira a liar. i hope that de oliveira gets zealous representation, it begins to explore cooperation with the prosecutors. glenn, how dare you suggest donald j trump with throw an employee under the bus? how dare you suggest that. that is shocking to hear you suggest such a thing. david, colin mentions conflicts of interest. i mention trump and his associates legal fees have cost him 42 if they ve already secured them a lawyer in d.c., as they already did with walt nauta, the diet coke aid. how much of this is a blatant conflict of interest in your view? i think quite a bit of it is, mehdi. here s the reason why, if you re representing either of
guilty plea yet, maybe he has. i still find it very curious that we do not have any marquee names that have flipped. that is unusual it. leads me to conclude the perhaps, jack smith is keeping his powder dry and we are going to see a sizeable january 6th indictment very soon. i still find it a curiosity. it would be phenomenal if mark meadows has done that. former white house chief of staff, certainly no diet coke aid, he is a big deal. david, last word to you. when it comes to election interference, when it comes to the 16 case, we talked about this in the abstract. democracy, overturning elections. we cannot forget that the reason we are here is because donald trump and one of the charges we believe might come up against him, he talks about in the target letter. the deprivation of rights. donald trump and his campaign
the diet coke aid. how much of this is a blatant conflict of interest in your view? i think quite a bit of it is, mehdi. here s the reason why, if you re representing either of them, you have to give them advice that is best for them. the longer this goes on, the best advice for them is to flip on trump. there is no way around. typically you get a new indictment if you re representing somebody. their question to you is, hey, am i looking at more time? they answer here is not really, you are already facing so many charges. it is far more likely that you re adding another defendant, another mouth that you have to hope stays closed. if it flips, and again, for the two people involved, given how much the money is going to be for them, if they cut off the pipeline of legal fees, they have invested interest in taking representation against trump. a lawyer s probably going to tell them that if they are being paid for by trump.