say, and the people have decided that they would want more limited access to guns, especially those that might be dangerous to certain elements of the community. they insist that the access to john guns, the keeping and bearing of the guns must be completely free, and subject to very few limitations. i'm not entirely surprised. i'm not surprised by the effort to blame these victims in families that would be terrorized, and to blame everybody that would be wondering at this point in time whether that would be turned on them. again, as charles says, the data makes clear who are the targets of the racially motivated attacks. it is often people of color, black people, people that are the most vulnerable in our society. >> charles, more than a decade ago in 2009, a bomb's first term in office, his department of homeland security sent law enforcement agencies and briefing warning of a rising threat of domestic right-wing expressionism, including right-wing terrorism. republican outraged, demeaning retraction, they got one. obama's head of dhs publicly apologized, and that team of enlisted produced that report was disbanded. in hindsight, a crazy mistake, but also, just a broader point, the liberals have been on the defensive about the rise of white supremacy for far too long. have they not? they've been far too worried about offending conservatives