That is correct. You explained earlier that your job in the white house was to coordinate United States and Ukraine Policy, is that right . It is to coordinate United States policy visavis ukraine, correct. You testified in the spring of this year that these officials, these ukrainian officials began asking you, quote, advice on how to respond to mr. Giulianis advances, end quote. Is that correct . That is correct. What do you understand they meant by mr. Giulianis advances . I understood that to mean both his public commentary, so publicly calling for investigations into 2016, burisma, and hunter biden, as well as his direct overtours to the government of ukraine directly and through proxies. Thats what i understood. As you understand it, under Whose Authority do you think mr. Giuliani was acting under . Congresswoman, i dont know. Did the ukrainian officials you were speaking to tell you that they were being asked to im sorry, can you say that again, maam . Do you think the ukrainian
this, the messaging around it is the fact that it is a very complex issue and, so, while republicans are very good with images, the dems need to get better around our messaging because we kind of sent the vice president to the lion s den on this issue. it feels to me like we cannot forget how complex this issue is. and sometimes i m like if a criticism is why didn t you go do this thing instead of that thing, then explain to me how doing a, or this thing, would help. yeah. women and men aren t assessed through the same lens. that s one thing we have to keep in mind whenever we re talking about the vice president. can women get angry and actually show it? is that something that we are going to have to get used to now that we have a vice president in kamala harris who is a woman? how does she navigate that dynamic? it is so tricky. and it s full of land mines.
republicans are pouncing on this, the messaging around it is the fact that it is a very complex issue and, so, while republicans are very good with images, the dems need to get better around our messaging because we kind of sent the vice president to the lion s den on this issue. it feels to me like we cannot forget how complex this issue is. and sometimes i m like if a criticism is why didn t you go do this thing instead of that thing, then explain to me how doing a, or this thing, would help. yeah. women and men aren t assessed through the same lens. that s one thing we have to keep in mind whenever we re talking about the vice president. can women get angry and actually show it? is that something that we are going to have to get used to now that we have a vice president in kamala harris who is a woman? how does she navigate that dynamic? it is so tricky. and it s full of land mines.
exactly you both heard on the call that you heard at the exact same time. and if you can t reach an agreement with regard to what happened on the call, how can any of us? an impeachment inquiry is supposed to be clear. it s supposed to be obvious. it s supposed to be overwhelming and compelling. and if two people on the call disagree honestly about whether or not there was a demand and whether or not anything should be reported on a call, that is not a clear and compelling basis to undo 63 million votes and remove a president from office. i yield my remaining time to mr. jordan. i thank the gentlemen for yielding. colonel vindman. why didn t you go after the call, why didn t you go to mr. morrison? i went immediately, per the instructions from the july 10th incident, i went immediately to mr. eisenberg.
paid for by the clinton campaign. just come out with it straight and tell the court. they didn t do that. the third round of questioning, peter strzok, i was asking about the dossier. he confirmed, the fbi confirmed they were getting parts of the dossier from bruce ohr. bruce ohr, whose wife nellie worked for fusion. it is coming to bruce ohr, going to the fbi. was that what they used? when they took to the fisa court? this is as scary as it gets. that s why the nunes memo was right on target. byron s column lays it out on the fact that they are saying this is just wrong. if the dossier wasn t important, why did you lead with it? why didn t you go laura: i m going to ask nunes about this too, if you re going to reference it, why not go all in and reference this is from hillary clinton. she paid for it. they did say they parted ways however it is curious, if they re going to mention it, why not go with it?