Good afternoon the meeting will come to order. This is the regularly scheduled meeting of the Land Use Committee my name is supervisor cowen and to my right is supervisor wiener and commissioner peskin your scheshg is clerk victor young at this time, id like to take a moment and thank leo and justus from sfgovtv so for assisting us electronic devices. Please silence any devices that may sound off during the proceedings. Items acted upon today will appear on the september board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. Thank you very much call item one. Item now and then ordinance amending the achievement planning code by rising the achievement scoping map to rezone olsen street as public and 50 x to usher and 85 x. Supervisor campos is the achievement sponsor of this item will lead the achievement discussion from this moment forward just said to recognize well have presentations from geo0 of planning and ann of the Mayors Office of housing supervisor any opening remarks. Yes. Mada
Ret row active from day one. The first date of misrepresentation and fraud the city can require reimbursement of the grant. I think existing law allows for that. That is going after people guilty of prod. From day one, correct . That is the question. You can pro pouse from day one. Fwraum the time you break the law you are libel to reemburse the city for fund they gave under false pretense. I dont think it should be asked. I think may be require today return the grant fund. Maybe be. May be meaning only if the City Attorney is successful prosecuting. You will be required to the extentrequired is may be required if you are bank rupt we may choose not to prosecute. Will be required. They still may not well get our City Attorney i think absolutely if they falsify their application and get a grant they shouldnt have gotten we will go after thaem from the the first dollar distributed. I think that is the spirit. That conclude the first round of input from the commission for us to continue.
laughter . I thank you. Working on the math commissioners. Okay. Okay commissioners we have a motion. Shes calculating. So commissioners will be two studios, 10 one bedrooms. Commissioners a motion to approve with conditions as amended within an eradicate sheet and like maximize is the height and activating macopen street frontage a stronger commercial frontage on Market Street providing excuse me combrans the west facade eliminating two of the individually dependent sfooechz and for the plans to clearly provides for utilities for multiply retail spaces on Market Street. It resolves the contradiction between the office space the issue of the eliminate. And better defining the commercial versus residential uses on Market Street. Not used uses the expression of residential and the height of the transparency. So commercial versus residential. As well as the Affordable Housing e rate. Anything else. Clarification regarding the condition to reduce the parking spaces. A reduction of offstree
Allies. Not to attempt or around one thing by regulation that pervades the whole lobbyist sphere and inventory to be adjusted should be addressed on a general basis. Ill call the question on your motion to excepting the amendment to be as discussed. Otherwise, adopting the language thats proposed for two 110 10, registration reporting. I call the question at all in favor, aye. Opposed . The motion is carried 32. The record to reflect commissioner andrews and hur dissented. Was their second on the motion or trackback for the minutes yes. Then, regulation 2. 110 11, which provides for a waiver of 500 Registration Fee is 500 annual reregister nation fee for 501 c 3 and 501 c four, nonprofit organizations, any discussion of the commission . Commissioner hur i think this is too broad. I think we ought to limit it to entities that file 49849 in the easy were 490 n that would provide exemption for organizations either file or reasonably intend to file that are, believe 500,000 or less. I thin
Heritage about their program. And maybe create a list about legacy businesses. Sure. Thats a great question. If there is nothing further we can move on to item two, review of the past events at the Planning Commission and staff report and announcements. Good afternoon tim frye. No formal report for you regarding the recent events of the Planning Commission but i have a few things to share with you. One is that the Planning Department hosted a table at the San Francisco history days at the old mint last week on march 5 and six. We answered general questions regarding the departments Preservation Program and Property Information and we did have a map posted where members of the public could write down landmarks they think should be designated in the future and we compiled the list and will share during the next Quarterly Report. Second is the department began the Public Outreach portion of the neighborhood commercial store front survey effort. The survey and historic statement will be in