The commission has consistently pushed for criteria which are being expressed on this particular roof design. We are working on a roof policy, that is hopefully reflecting what we are saying here. In the spirit of what we, all as a group have to talk about. In accordance to the roof deck policy which we have not yet approved. That is in flux, i would suggest that condition to what commissioner moore said, the unoccupied area of the roof be noted in the drawing. And it reflects the past not doing three years. You are okay with the placement of the roof deck . You just want to make sure that the other portion of the roof is clearly designated or delineated as non occupied . Correct. Okay. I will take dr. Approve the project as is to make sure that the portion of the roof that doesnt have a roof deck is clearly delineated that it is not to be occupied. Very good. If there is nothing further there is a motion to be seconded to take dr and approve the project as has been revised. Noting on
It for years. I want to get paid for that. I have one of the same doors and my bedrooms. Let let me add to that, you mentioned that the Building Code requires 50 opening. The Building Code allowed that to be like a wall and literally be open. That 50 opening has to be wild walled off in this way. It has to be enclosed so that is why we often see these floortoceiling glass doors that provide an opening for the light and can provide a full enclosure. Versus a pony well. If i might, one last thing. And all of our units, we are bringing in outside air for mechanical ventilation for all the apartments. Because it is on venice, so meet to to meet the sound issues, we are bringing fresh air from the inside, putting that into the bedrooms, but the bedroom does not have to rely upon the sliding glass door to be open to get ventilation. Great. One of the questions with administrator, the apartment requirement, people injured mentioned that there is too much parking. What is allowed on van ness .
That is hopefully reflecting what we are saying here. In the spirit of what we, all as a group have to talk about. In accordance to the roof deck policy which we have not yet approved. That is in flux, i would suggest that condition to what commissioner moore said, the unoccupied area of the roof be noted in the drawing. And it reflects the past not doing three years. You are okay with the placement of the roof deck . You just want to make sure that the other portion of the roof is clearly designated or delineated as non occupied . Correct. Okay. I will take dr. Approve the project as is to make sure that the portion of the roof that doesnt have a roof deck is clearly delineated that it is not to be occupied. Very good. If there is nothing further there is a motion to be seconded to take dr and approve the project as has been revised. Noting on the plans that the area of the roof deck the area of the roof that is unoccupied. On that motion. [roll call] so moved, commissioners. That mot
Floor area, and the light and air requirement which is eight of the floor area, and add that to the same four and eight for the in between room, and that tells you the minimum Natural Light and ventilation area you have to provide in the exterior wall, the window. Right. On these nested bedrooms, what percentages are you at . The opening . How would that stack up . Have you provided the minimum . In most cases, we are over the minimum, just to be sure. We are somewhere between 50 to 260 . The units are tight and some of the kitchens run to that wall so we have a drywall partition there, and we make the window a sliding partition as large as we can. We use a private firm from San Francisco and we have been doing it for years. I want to get paid for that. I have one of the same doors and my bedrooms. Let let me add to that, you mentioned that the Building Code requires 50 opening. The Building Code allowed that to be like a wall and literally be open. That 50 opening has to be wild walle
That to be modified in a manner that theres an open floor plan. Any other questions . No, that is all. One quick question, what commissioner more is indicating, would it fit our new roof deck policy . I moved to take 2018009355drp and establish dr and approve the project. As revised. I think its an overstatement commissioner richards to say we have a roof deck policy. The commission has consistently pushed for criteria which are being expressed on this particular roof design. We are working on a roof policy, that is hopefully reflecting what we are saying here. In the spirit of what we, all as a group have to talk about. In accordance to the roof deck policy which we have not yet approved. That is in flux, i would suggest that condition to what commissioner moore said, the unoccupied area of the roof be noted in the drawing. And it reflects the past not doing three years. You are okay with the placement of the roof deck . You just want to make sure that the other portion of the roof is