Us that they do not care. This Management Company is the reason we need laws protecting renters. The information and examples given today paint a clear picture of centrons pattern of neglect and their abdive abdication of their responsibilities. Heathers stove, its who are identifying to me that they would neglect Safety Measures around gas lines. They do not care. Several of us have had repeated leaks from overhead pipes and plumbing. When they finally did send their inhouse handyman to help with the water bubble on my ceiling, they refused to address the under lying issue as, quote, water was no longer gushing from the ceiling. They do not care. Ive alerted them to mold that has been in my bathroom that has been there since i moved in. Ive repeatedly asked them to replace the caulking to prevent water damage to the wall behind my tub, and theyve ignored follow up. During inspection, nancy mar had said this is how bathrooms look, and that they painted over the mold, which is a ridicul
So if there is if the commission does have the desire for us to look at a denser Zoning District here, i think it would be incumbent upon us to sit down with the project sponsor, but also to get the feel of the neighbourhood. Because i would be a little surprised if there wasnt push back on that in the neighbourhood to increase the density. We have to have that discussion. It was not the project that was analyzed because that is not the project that was presented to us. If you are interested in us pursuing a change in the zoning on the site, i think that is more of a policy question that we have to explore with the developer and the neighbourhood. Commissioner johnson . Thank you very much. Not to prolong. So, totally agree with commissioner moore in terms of e. I. R. Typically within the e. I. R. , you are asking questions usually within the confines of what is analyzed under the e. I. R. And then they come out in their responses and i just think that this is it is incumbent upon us t
A repair station and additional 12 class 2 spaces near the pedestrian entrances as approved by sfmta. The project is with two zoning districts. The project seeks conditional use authorization for a development of a large lot, over 10,000 square feet, per planning code 121. 1. And merger of a lot greater than 5,000 square feet in the rto district 121. 7. These are the entitlements before you. The existing structure at 1965 market is historic. In 1924, it was built as a mortuary and funery chapel. A third floor was added in 1933. The building is eligible for the National Register with commercial development and north neighborhood for its distinctive Spanish Colonial Mission Revival architecture and the savings and loan established. The project would retain the 1965 historic facade and retain the uses for interpretive display to be permanently installed in the retail space. The project sponsor has elected to utilize the state and city bonus as implemented by planning code 206. 6. In accor
After filipino historical figures. The Filipino Community appreciates the lee familys willingness to work with our community on this program, especially aiding after School Programs and jobs in the hotel facility. We would also like to thank you them with the neutral car check. Thank you. President hillis thank you. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon. Our 18,000squarefoot Community Gardens has been there for over 30 years and its very popular Public Open Space with about 300 gardening beds that are provided to local seniors at no charge. Of course, we realize this building would cast some shadow. It costs about 200,000 shadow hours a year, not quite. We approached the developer and asked for mitigation of that impact. The gardens being 30 years old needs a complete rebuilding and were its about a 500,000 project overall. Were 2 3 of the way through it. And but we still have more to go. We have had theres a precedent set that before the city agreed to donate 1 on every hour of shadow
Footage that you need. Open space, private deck. 81,000 square feet. Not too bad. You get more open space. Garage. 2032 square feet for parking. Sorry, guys. Way too much. Two Parking Spaces per unit. Dont support that. This commission does not has not supported, and im not speaking for the commission, but our track record on supporting excess parking has not been good. So, 870 square feet for parking, eight spaces versus i dont know whether it would be four ors three in a transitrich neighbourhood. Again, to demolish Historic Resource in my community over these numbers, it doesnt add up for me. Im sorry. When i look at the page s28, the partial preservation alternative, how it doesnt meet your objective four which is the open space in the backyard and number five, the profit. I would respectfully act that there is a Second Opinion on the soundness of the building and see the actual numbers on why it doesnt add up when you actually get more in return in the final in the partial preserv