Candidates. Theyre all smart people. Theyre all conservatives and apart from the few headtohead explosions that we all could have done without there was far more agreement on issues than disagreement. Energy, inflation, overregulation, wokeness, china warnings the biggest division was probably overukraine. You can be unfair there were no magical moment zinger lines but they are hard to come by. This is memorable one from Ronald Reagan. Governor reagan typically is against another proposal. Governor . There you to go again. Larry there you go, that one is still playing 40 years later. At different points during the debate each of the candidates had their moments. The pundits are scrambling around to pick winners and losers. Honestly i dont think anybody totally stood out. I dont think there were any real breakout, breakouts. Some minor polling hiccups here and there but frankly the big picture doesnt change. Former. President biden donald trump is overwhelming favorite to win the gop no
Or not to keep in the action the item about alternating want and Vice President i think that is fine to change it slightly to acknowledge the practice of often alternating wanted and Vice President mayoral or appointees that speaks to what is often been done but not always about this done it says we should look at it as we go forward i suggest this is amended to the subcommittee or to the full board. My it seems like theres convenes to omit. Yeah. Omit. That sounds fine to me otherwise i think Everything Else is fine and leaving the noticing is k34r5ik9d question we should look at it in the future but it seems like we should stay with what has been done in the past wear not voting. On the submittal hearing guidelines. Were submitting to the rules and regulations as well and just for clarity the director performance evaluation didnt have to be wrapped into the rules themselves but is a practice to the commission to simply initiate that closed session. Could the City Attorney weigh in on
Item about alternating want and Vice President i think that is fine to change it slightly to acknowledge the practice of often alternating wanted and Vice President mayoral or appointees that speaks to what is often been done but not always about this done it says we should look at it as we go forward i suggest this is amended to the subcommittee or to the full board. My it seems like theres convenes to omit. Yeah. Omit. That sounds fine to me otherwise i think Everything Else is fine and leaving the noticing is k34r5ik9d question we should look at it in the future but it seems like we should stay with what has been done in the past wear not voting. On the submittal hearing guidelines. Were submitting to the rules and regulations as well and just for clarity the director performance evaluation didnt have to be wrapped into the rules themselves but is a practice to the commission to simply initiate that closed session. Could the City Attorney weigh in on that. Deputy City Attorney Susan
The other guidelines you have to help me. The plan submittal guidelines. Yes. It was as opposed to be a distinct and separate. I was told that. Thats correct. Theres a decision who to create the submittal guidelines and talk later what goes into that it was included if the packet of the proposed language. It was. It was a clarifying document. So then basically what was documented today is Current Practices if we choose to take an action to create the hearing guideline. Thats correct. Commissioner antonini. Yeah on the issue of whether or not to keep in the action the item about alternating want and Vice President i think that is fine to change it slightly to acknowledge the practice of often alternating wanted and Vice President mayoral or appointees that speaks to what is often been done but not always about this done it says we should look at it as we go forward i suggest this is amended to the subcommittee or to the full board. My it seems like theres convenes to omit. Yeah. Omit. T
Like to remind the members of the audience that the commission does not tolerate disruptions of any kind. Proceedings. And when speaking before the commission, if you care to, do state your name for the record. Id like to call roll at this time commissioner president fong commissioner wu commissioner antonini commissioner johnson commissioner moore and commissioner richards commissioner hillis is expected to be absent today commissioners, that places you under your is item is consideration of items property for continuance case number one accessory use entertainment it is for july 16, 2015, and item 2 for case e at bay street a appeal of a primary negative declaration is proposed until august 6, 2015 and item 3 capital avenue conditional use authorization is proposed for continuance until august 16, 2015 i i have no speaker cards any Public Comment on item the items proposed for continuance . Okay. Not seeing any Public Comment is closed. Commissioner antonini move to continue items 1,