not a so gun shy republicans pledged allegiance to guns at the annual nr convention as a second deadl mass shooting in a week play out of just hours away i louisville i ll talk one-on-one wit morgan mcgarvey the kentucky congressman behind the fiery rebuke of republican prioritization of banning book and direct shows over weapon of war plus, fox news, outfoxed the media empire said to begin a huge jury trial tomorrow for pushing for president trump big lie over stolen election all right and what s called on of the most consequentia defamation lawsuits in decades it s black maternal health week did you know black women are three times more likely than white women to die from pregnancy related cause? we ll take a look at why thi is happening and what s bein done to narrow the widenin disparities in materna mortality. all of that and more is coming up and good sunday morning to you i am katie phang the nra convention wraps up in indianapolis today as more gun violence or perhap
summary judgment of a massive ought yen of viewers, a past logical fear of a ratings defeat and witches ease brew against in a network s own working journalists and fact checkers. we should tell you at any moment we re expecting breaking news in the form of fresh filens from dominion and fox, to lay out any arguments in the case. while we wait, for years we have turned to phrases lie inside the bubble and the echo chamber to describe that relationship between fox news and its viewers. never before has it been so plain to see from the outside. the discovery filings show that fox hosts were telling their viewers what they knew they wanted to here even when the very same fox news host communicated the truth to one another in private, which was different from what they were broadcasting. dominion s case may very well wrest on their ability to get a jury to understand that distinction. today, though, the story goes even further in the form of something rare. a highly visible i
big case, starts tomorrow with opening statements glenn, i would like to start with you the judge already rejected several first amendmen offenses that fox hoped to invoke how do you think that that i going to shape the way tha opening statements are going t look what are you expecting to hear tomorrow katie, it really feels like liability here, right? defamation has already bee proved at least based on wha we have seen publicly recorded and some of the rulings by judge davis. it is pretty clear that fox wa caught red-handed tellin election lies. knowingly telling election lie to its viewers it feels like at the end of th day this is going to come down to the damages dominion voting systems can prove it s suffere as a result of those lies. why would say that this tria would not be publicly broadcas is so disappointing. think about the gift that give to fox news.
the viewers will not be able t see the attorneys for dominion cross-examined tucker carlson, for example, with the fact tha he wrote, he sent messages saying, sydney powell is lying and yet fox news continue to present those very lies, what would contend were democracy busting lies to its viewers. boy, it would be really nice i the viewing public got to se tucker carlson being cross examined with information like that angelo, right now in th short term fox continues t produce high ratings how do you think that this dominion lawsuit, along with the smartmatic lawsuit, abby maddox s lawsuit, th shareholder derivative lawsuit how do you think it will affec fox s bottom line? talk about how carriage fees fit into this whole calculus i thought you posted a tweet about a very interested in it.
democracy-busting lies, to their viewers because as tucker says they believe us and you know, we re earning the green, how do you call them anything but america s adversaries? they are certainly, harry, democracy s adversaries. and i wonder your thoughts, if you think doj sees it that way and if they do if they re acting as if they see it that way? yes, i think they see it that way. and the proof of the pudding will be cases. but the case will be united states versus. these people will be on the other side of the v. and if they re not, as glenn says, it s a really rough patch for america to know how, you know, accountability will be you know, will be actually delivered. so you know, that is the kind of takeaway. but i want to just say the line i was really struck by what you said before the break,