they are free to work for your opponent in your next reelection. they re free to not donate re to you. so what is different whent people who don t like what target is doing just decideth they re going to go shopatrigh somewhere else? i mean thardt to me. i don t know what the right word is . my mom walked me out of greece when i was a teenager. i mean, it s beee whenn going oa a while now. it shi a consequence olef makin decisions. you can laugh, but i never got to see greece is a consequence. e of decisions and people haveeo the right to do it right. tre exactly. try and now target is criticizing its own customers for being upset about this, for the fact tha tt theshe displays are right next to children s section during the very front of the store where a chils sectiod can t helt go by. they should be surprised again that their customer is goinge si to shop somewhere else, someplace that doesn t take such an overt political stance. er shopse suchdoesn t force this into the faces of yo
negotiations that have always seemed to figure out a way to get a resolution. the keefe y point, the fact tha they are talking and engaged and they are meeting tonight and the fact that the president and the speaker will be meeting face to face, these are always positive steps that don t necessarily move the ball forward on the substance. it the substance that will make it happen and the negotiators on both sides have done this before, they know there s ways to thread the needle but there s significant issues out here and not a lot of time left. so whether or not this unlocks everything, it pretty much has to. there aren t many alternatives here. i think the people in the room know that, the white house knows that, the president made clear he knows that today and i think that s the driving force behind what they hope will be a shift in the dynamic that has just been very poor on both the policy and the rhetoric over the
cooperations for seems like sign that this investigation i promoting its endgame. in turn, this raises a question and it s not a substantive question, it s not a questio about the what donald trump is accused of doing, purely political question, for second if, you ll indulge me here s the question, d republicans really want to bac trump a third time i mean, that clip you saw? he s a new hampshire today campaigning. gearing up for his third consecutive presidential campaign he s in the process over the last month i would say, of consulting the republican fiel behind him, his lead has widened over s closest rival ron desantis, and in fact, a new piece in politico today, outlined how many republican are effectively resignin themselves to the fact tha that man, the one who attempte to overthrow an election, will be the republican nominee. one republican strategy saying quote, we re just went out t go into the basement, right of the tornado and come back up when it s over to rebuild th neig
because it could mean more tha that as you pointed out so i think we are now going to see the end of, this even if i cannot pinpoint a case with history of procedural problems i think really what is stoppin the court here is the fact tha the play was probably did no have a right to be in court in the fort first place, given th issues of standing i timeliness michelle, let s not get som of the slippery slope things there s a lot of people an raphael that, said at least wa mifepristone in medication abortion which even at the time was the most commonly used abortion in the united states. and once that gets challenged, people say at least there is birth control. in fact, they are all of the sort i don t know why people wh didn t like abortion hav decided that they also don t like birth control but people are living thei religious beliefs or their personal beliefs inform ho women should be policed. it is really hard t describe this as anything othe than something that seem called like.
they might be miscarrying. you hug stockpiled mifepriston in your state, does anything that s happen tonight at the supreme court changed your outlook on the way you r thinking about mifepristone an access to abortion no, it does not change it i m glad there is a temporar stay on this, but it is only temporary. it doesn t change the fact tha the republican party will come at a woman s right of choice every chance and every day tha can, so we are not out of th woods yet. but, because our state was for cited, we ordered th mifepristone before the texa decision so we will be able to distribute the product to women, no matter what happens in th u.s. supreme court i know that sounds surprising, but under our state law an relationship to the federa court, we will be able t distribute this product no matter what the court does and regarding fda removal. so people washington will be able to have this right honored, i m glad we took that step,