to get off their lawn? they re probably around the same age as aerosmith front man steven tyler, the rock n roll icon celebrates his 65th birthday today. and while he s now retirement age, that has not stopped tyler or many other rock stars of his era from living on the edge. dude looks like a lady happy birthday, steven tyler. 65 years young and dude looks like a lady. last month tyler dressed in drag to visit his old stomping grounds american idol. the show he quit judging just last year. i m going to sing a song called tell your ma, tell your pa. but that s the only quitting we ve seen tyler do. at the age most americans want to retire, the former aerosmith front man continues to rock on. why won t mick jagger or steven tyler retire? billboard estimated that for five shows last year the rolling stones made $5 million per show, that s take home money. that s how much money those guys
b bin laden couldn t have reached for a gun because his guns were somewhere else, which they only found later, that bin laden was not shot by this guy in the esquire article in the way it described. jay, of course this all happened at night, they were all wearing night vision goggles. there was no electricity in the ilding or the neighborhood. it is a confusing situation. but that said, there seems to be a preponderance of people saying that the esquire account is not an accurate account. and what s the biggest discrepancy? is it just who pulled the tryinger? partly who pulled the trigger. one can account is much less heroic than the others. the people pushing what they say is the real account is the one that isn t that heroic where bin laden is sort of finished off on the floor, a lucky shot, as opposed to a man-to-man reach for the gun, right. and so that s the difference. and also there s a difference of opinion which of the s.e.a.l.s was really responsible. the point
a marriage, just saying that is viewed as discrimination. so in illinois, in massachusetts, in washington, d.c., religious organizations are told they can t adopt children because they re discriminating by not placing kids with same-sex couples. we ve seen benefits fights. we ve seen businesses. businesses that, for example, do weddings being told if you don t do same-sex weddings, again, you are discriminating. what you are doing is putting a brand-new idea into the law that there is absolutely no difference between a man and a woman coming together in marriage and two men or two women, and that those of us who think there is a difference are the functional equivalent of bigots. first of all, illinois doesn t have same-sex marriage it only took civil unions in illinois. they shut down the adoption agencies. you and i don t see the world with the same set of eyes. i have extraordinary respect and admiration for same-sex couples and loving people that care as
yet another one reaches retirement age. welcome back. time for the buried lead. a story we don t think is getting enough attention. there are few things americans love more than a comeback story, but is the man who used to run the cia ready to play the prodigal son? tonight former general david petraeus comes out of the shadows after a damaging affair with his biographer, one that cost him his job and shook the obama administration. here to talk about this attempt at rehabilitation is a communications counselor who has worked for fortune 500 companies and plenty of elected officials, dan mcbegin. mr. mcgin, thank you for joining us. big question here, petraeus speaking tonight at the university, a copy of the speech obtained by the new york times. quote, needless to say i join
absolutely factual what he s asserting. that said, what s the constitutional question? that s what we re supposed to be adjudicating, whether or not it s constitutional to deny people based on their sexual orientation to enter into marriage. let me just assert, i have no evidence whatsoever in places like spain, since 2005 and other countries of the world where marriage is an institution has been under any sort of assault or the sky is falling in. massachusetts and elsewhere in america we haven t seen that somehow there s been this devastating or deleterious impact because they are entering into the same institution we have been afforded in our lives. how about that, brian? we have not seen traditional marriage, opposite sex marriage harmed in any way places where it s taken place, have we? that s not true at all. one need only look to what happened in massachusetts where catholic charities adoption agency, one example, is put out of business because when you redefine marriage, you