The biggest thing it had to do with the project was where would the interstate go. The engineers worked with the possibility for a long time of running the interstate over the top of the dam. That would have required a larger dam, of course. But all of this is con verveg at the same time. The interstate planners are making their plans for which path the interstate is going to ta take. The decision to run it through Summit County the final decision wasnt made until 1960. By that time, denvers engineering of the dam had moved on. So they ended up running it along the base of the dam rather than on it. It did have some affect. Like i said, by the time the interstate was designated, it was no longer really an issue. It was essentially a water project. Yes. I think we have time for one more question. Which one of you wants to ask the question . Flip a coin. I wanted to know your guesstimate on Vacation Land of the huge traffic jams we see now on 70. How is that going to impact our economy a
Transport like what eisenhower had, which was one of the things that apparently convinced him of the need for a system of defense highways. Im not aware that there was any use of interstate 70 for those purposes. It seems to have been, as far as the evidence i have been able to find. There was a lot of talk at those times about the highways being defense highways. The official name for them, for the interstate system when it was created in 1956, the National System of interstate and defense highways. Thank you. Two questions. I believe i read or heard that the interstate through Glenwood Canyon cost more than the entire rest of the interstate 70 cost total. I dont know if thats true. But i frankly would not be surprised at all. The cost as you probably know it kept ballooning as the design changed, as they ran into as Highway Builders always do, into unexpected geological obstacles. I would not be surprised, but i dont know the dollar values. Another question about president eisenhower
Phones we are caring around. It is an criticized by attorney general holder and the head of the fbi. How much did what apple and google, what they are saying they are going to do, how much did that hurt some of the work you did . Was a going too far between the balance of security and mike, you start. We want to be respectable people jobs. Move to protect privacy of individuals and mobile. Isis we give up so much information. They want to get into our content, look at information. Justiceur department of is having discussions with specific organizations. Or havee subpoena search warrants for this information . That s changed a little bit in the recent past but i am not sure where those discussions are. We look to work for the companys and how we can get the information we can gather in a National Security type of information in one of the means do that . It is back to the basic question of what is available . What are you capturing that we could get . We run into this problem before in
Remarkable, a coming together of all of these federal agencies working seamlessly together. To give you an example, when we have the denial of service attacks that were hitting our financial institutions, we were was working to these were bot nets. The fbi was reaching out to their counterparts. There is a lot of noise out there. What we did, and this is unique. To state department decided do. I was thought it was a bad thing. You can have a positive, where you say i need your help on something, i want you to elevate this. For about 20 countries, we said, this is serious. We want your help. We want to build a cooperative framework to deal with these threats. That has been part of our mission, working with the other agencies. More and more countries are taking this seriously. Is not just a technical issue. That is another transformation. , you would to go in person, youlk to a are the tech, you deal with it. Now, people understand it is a National Security issue. Human rights issue, for
Intoxicated woman he met at an oncampus party last month. This 19yearold brock turner in a suit with his father next to him. And his attorney Mike Armstrong as they headed to the arraignment. The hearing began promptly at 9 00 a. M. And only lasted a few minutes. After withdrawing from Stanford University last week, turner apparently moved back home to dayton, ohio. His attorney asked that the former freshman not have to go to all of his Court Appearances in california because of the expense, but the judge denied that. He must attend every single time. Prosecutors requested a protective order, which is essentially a restraining order to stay 100 yards away from the victim. The judge did grant that. Two grad students happened to pass by the alleged attack january 18th outside a fraternity house. They chased after him as turner fled tackled him, and held him until police arrived. The Deputy District Attorney for the Sex Crimes Unit says that this case is unique and called the two men who