i ll tell yo u that now. also tonight, take a look at a screen. in a minute, w youe will hear fy our very own sarah carter righth here on set, who was accosted ae by far left protesters on the streets of new york . here s a quick preview of what went down and out of here. get out of here. get out of here with this fireball. we are here in peace and love from your general liberal pea democratic psycho. anyway, we havove the full videt . thank god she s okay.ad, sh straight ahead, she lle telllll us a story, but we begin only a few blocks away where former president trump was arraigned on thirty four felony charges. now, yesterday, for allegedly mislabeling a couple of documents, basically. now, of course, these charges were cooked up and stacked by a manhattan d.a. by the name of alvin bragg. if any fansf al hervie to ful a political fantasy campaign promise, which i have a big problem with , and like many liberals, dreams of seeing donald trump in orange jumpsuit onne b
alvin bragg himself. i don t forget the constitution mandates equal protection under the law, equal application of or our laws. e no man, no woman should be above the law, but no one should be below the law either. and all americans deservw e equa justice and equal application.io so inn. pragu e jumps through hoops to connect trump to a far fetched campaign finance violatio n or some otherderlying underlying unstated crime becaus, e of a mislabeled nda. well, let s remember how democrats were treated under similar circumstances. let s look as. look at bill and hillary clinton and barack obama and sheila jackson lee and martin o malley and so many others connected to very serious campaign financeon-lee violations. none of them ever, ever, ever charged with any crime, just cre like biden was not rated nonenoo of his four locations ofocationo top secret documents just like hillary clinton got away with the leading subpoenaed emails. y clintogothirty three thousand
venue. but tt i think the likelihos of that is very low. but you re you re basically saying you think he will be foun sd guilty in spite of thes? i mean, what is a non charge? they didn t even state whate the crime is . it remindscrime me of when i w a civil rights person ints the south. sideerso you spit on the sidewar even if you didn t spit s on the sidewalk and the sherifpf said you spit on the sidewalk and charge you with it, theret was no chance you could get acquitted by an all white i, jim crow jury. re everybody knew that you were crowcent, but you wereal going to be convicted . i don t want to make t comparisons with jim crow insons new york city, but incrow new york city, you cannot get 12 jurors who are prepared to have an objective view and want to walk around town and have people say that s a juror who free donald trumpe and allowed him to be president . and thand the same thing is truf the judge. any decent judgeng would change the venue immediately. but this judge w
he mentions a crime that heed ae doesn t tell us what i butt is e now, keep in mind, the document infractions there bootstrap to an underlying felony. in fact, this entire cases en hinges on that underlyingrlying undefined felony. but bragge doesn t feel the need to tell anybody about the purported crime that servesi as the foundation of his entire case. it s not even listed in the indictment as is required by the constitution. look at your sixth amendment. it commands at the state informed defendants abouts that the nature of the charges and the evidencetate against th. according to thein new york times , quote, given noti partial notice, well, that might be standard operating procedure intandar manhattan, bt that s standard procedure. suddenly, in the bright lights, yesterday seemed like systemicmi infringement. believe or not,is the constitution of this country applies to everyntryre c american, even though there ares democrats and leftists that want to shred even new yorkers r ,ev
bootstrapped to an unstated t crime to manufacture felony chargenufacturs. headl and look aint this headline, fae news, cnn. why would i ever quote them as a source anyway? so not exactly approach.exactl i love this crowd. not exactly a pro trump organization. aughter]quote, why the manhatta. case against trump is so pathetically weak. i and here s the left wing website vox .com. en t a they re not a fan of minene anyway. wragg built one of the most controversial high profile criminal cases in american history. upon the most uncertain of foundations and that foundationn could crumble into dust. and then there s thihes headlini from the new york slimey times that trump indictment is a legal embarrassment.l wow. embarr wow. assmeni write even the new yorks gets it right once in a while. meanwhile, on tv, you ve got the media mob. liey were visibly disappointed, liberal joe and co.. thouought they were going