some people don t want to take them and that s their freedom and that s what we have to do but people don t want to take them because they don t trust biden, they don t trust the administration. howie: mollie, how should the media react that many people aren t taking the vaccines because they don t trust joe biden, how is that helpful to getting more people to take vaccines that he deserves credit if crash program? we might ask when the media handled it last year, joe biden and kamala harris said you couldn t trust the vaccines because they were developed under the trump administration and he was rushing them out, the media did not push back against the claims which had to have done a lot to undermine people s thoughts about the vaccines. howie: both were wrong. it s one to have things that s frustrating. we have the completely different standards on coverage based on who is president. but under a biden presidency suddenly that just goes away. under a trump presidency we have ticke
witnesses end up hurting their case? that is a huge mystery to me because i can promise you i knew what my witnesses were goapg say occasionally a witness will surprise use on witness stand but usually they ll tell you something you ve never heard before they don t contradict story they told you pre-trial so when testified that he raised his gun at rittenhouse and that disputed the testimony that he had given to the police when he said he didn t have his gun, why did the prosecutor put him on witness stand? one of the stores was a lie. either he lost the gun before the encounter, of course, as we know as video shows, he had gun in his hand and was pointing it at rittenhouse. how did prosecutors not know that in advance and they should have never put him on witness stand because he looked like someone the jury couldn t trust and i think to john s point this was a real great example of the jury kind of ignoring what prosecutor was saying and actually listening to judge s
witnesses end up hurting their case? that is a huge mystery to me because i can promise you i knew what my witnesses were goapg say occasionally a witness will surprise use on witness stand but usually they ll tell you something you ve never heard before they don t contradict story they told you pre-trial so when testified that he raised his gun at rittenhouse and that disputed the testimony that he had given to the police when he said he didn t have his gun, why did the prosecutor put him on witness stand? one of the stores was a lie. either he lost the gun before the encounter, of course, as we know as video shows, he had gun in his hand and was pointing it at rittenhouse. how did prosecutors not know that in advance and they should have never put him on witness stand because he looked like someone the jury couldn t trust and i think to john s point this was a real great example of the jury kind of ignoring what prosecutor was saying and actually listening to judge s
witnesses end up hurting their case? that is a huge mystery to me because i can promise you i knew what my witnesses were goapg say occasionally a witness will surprise use on witness stand but usually they ll tell you something you ve never heard before they don t contradict story they told you pre-trial so when testified that he raised his gun at rittenhouse and that disputed the testimony that he had given to the police when he said he didn t have his gun, why did the prosecutor put him on witness stand? one of the stores was a lie. either he lost the gun before the encounter, of course, as we know as video shows, he had gun in his hand and was pointing it at rittenhouse. how did prosecutors not know that in advance and they should have never put him on witness stand because he looked like someone the jury couldn t trust and i think to john s point this was a real great example of the jury kind of ignoring what prosecutor was saying and actually listening to judge s
really saying to these generals, you know, you have got to make sure i am in the loop on this. now, milley may be criticized for what some may think was overstepping his authority, but according to woodward and costa he felt he couldn t trust trump and that he needed to take any and all necessary precautions to prevent him from doing something dangerous. and we will get into that later about why he thought right. he couldn t trust president trump. but meanwhile, one of the dramatic scenes in this woodward book takes place in the oval office. it is the night of january 5th, so before the election is supposed to be certified by vice president pence. so what have you learned about this conversation between vice president pence and president trump? so we ve known the meeting happened. what the book reveals are the actual quotes, the conversation as trump is trying to pressure pence to overturn the election on january 6th. woodward and costa report that