number one, the algorithm used well as i just said in the intro identify some words, sure. but what about all the others? anything can lead to a fight and those of us that live in new york know that very well. secondly is almost like unnecessary lipstick on a pig. it s like the labeling on pork and poultry that say this is hormone free. of course it is, because it would be against the law otherwise. it seems like twitter is trying to do something to give them a gold star they can hang on the door while not necessarily making changes to the health of the platform. it s window dressing, that s where it is. we know big tech is minute blading us in all sorts of ways between shadow banning and the boosting, and of course when they do something like this, it s not going to make conversation help here. one way or another it will drive more anger and more
صدى البلد: شاهد تسريب فيديو يكشف ضلوع المخابرات البريطانية في مظاهرات روسيا
elbalad.news - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from elbalad.news Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
you thought i put you on the spot. put that aside. feel free to address it if you want but that aside, looking from the perspective much trying to win if you re the trump campaign, how does this looming conversation help or hurt? i will say two things, whether you re running for president or senate, one things republicans do far better than democrats is draw a very direct line towards electing them to those offices and judges. i think that s one of the big reasons why republicans in 2016 with the fight over mayor garland but in 2018 you see the difference between electing republican representatives and that was helpful to president trump to get them over the hump to vote for them and certainly the two scotus appointments helped. the third point, i worked with jeb bush a little bit in 2016. one of the interesting things i m seeing now is when you
forever. it blacks out other parts that don t matter much. defending ford for maybe not recalling all of the details. there is bash lash and we don t know if there s going to be a hearing. does this conversation help or hurt republicans? here s the issue, right, i think the issue surrounding a hearing is a misnomer. the intent is to get at the truth, to unearth facts. the intent it to get the witnesses, the information, the documentation, everything we need, the american people, so an informed decision can be made. this in my view is not a hearing, it s a sham. if you want to determine whether something happened, you don t call dr. ford to state her peace and the judge to deny it. you call anyone and everyone who might be relevant to the information you re trying to get. from a political perspective, and errol would know much better than me, i don t know how the republicans survive in this midterm election just cramming the nomination down the throat with a sham hearing.