mueller was effective. they animated his work. they knew it was a disaster. the investigation was not impeded and hindered and not stopped. it is heavy evidence to indict the president. anyone else would have done what he did would have been indicted. this is not over, it is just bizar bizarre. the senate would not convict him. president trump attacked congressman elijah cummings tweeting his district is quote disgusted and infested. no human beings would live there. i didn t do the tweet. i can t talk about why he did what he did. there is a pattern here. our president has a hate agenda. he does not have a policy age a agenda. the president is disgusting and racist. it has absolute zero to do with race. the president was supposed to represent all americans.
flirtation with the russians. the fbi is investigating various strands of that. we don t know. it has never been answered and mueller did not talk about it. house of intelligence committee is still troo ig ying to dig wi fbi. what did the fbi find and what are they still investigating and what are the implications for national security. that could be painful for donald trump going forward. what do you think in. it is a great point. when the fbi does account intelligence incision, they re reporting up intelligence channels. the dni, the drenirector now ha trump s loyalist that s going to come into the job and putting that person in the chain of command who has the ability to declassify and end the investigation of the president s circle. that s a dangerous president. that maybe one of the motivating factors for the president here
he stops alo who stops him along the way? mitch mcconnell. he s somebody who when president trump talks about getting down prices at reasonable ways of prescription drugs like reimporting drugs from canada, or making medicare and re-negotiating prices. these are reasonable things that is stopped by mcconnell. so it is not rocket science. you are saying positive things about president trump s agenda. would you support him in 2020? well, for me it is not about being antitrump or protr-trump. i am going to be with somebody who ll work with any president regardless of where that president he or she who would you vote for? i have a great concern with voting for president trump because i believe that anybody
pass bill that would authorize $775 million to bolster state s electi election systems. my friend, the democratic leader is asking new hampshiuna consent to pass in the house of representatives relating to american elections is a highly partisan bill where we spent two years hiking up a conspiracy theory about president trump and russia and who continues to ignore this administration. with that, ill li would like to welcome in ken dilanian and our politico national correspondent, natasha bertran and our msnbc contributor, betsy woodruff.
answering these questions. so how are republicans just going to continue to defend what the president is doing, or essentially refrain from criticizing him, which kind of amounts to the same thing? i think there are a couple differences. the think the view go back where you came from and series of tweets and these. first of all, congress is not in session to people like phil and you and others will not be chasing him down in hallways. lucky them. and too they re not eager to inject themselves to a third tweet on the sunt. and the only african-american republican in the house saw them as these type of tweets as fundamentally different as the go-back and i respect his point of view. but i think republicans that i talked to on this, certainly baltimore had its share of problems, that s undeniable, in the last three or so mayors have not been up to par, so to speak. what president trump is doing is members of congress are not mares. he s not proposing a new answer.