sustainable given their audience level and the costs involved. nobody would touch them in a privatised world and try and make money out of them. they re simply not commercially sustainable. so this isn t about making a kind of kneejerk defend the bbc case. this is about thinking about the rest of the radio industry. the commercial world would be affected. not only would all those bbc local and nation services closed down the bbc networks collectively, one, two, three, four and five could just about survive if they were prepared to cut their cost base by about their content costs by about 60%. well, good luck saving the good bits of the bbc that people know and love if you have to take 60% off the cost and then the third leg of this is that the commercial sector, if the bbc, if the networks were taking commercials, the commercial sector would suddenly find its own revenue base cut back by ten, 15, 20%. therefore, the commercial
bbc local radio and all the nations radio. they simply are not commercially sustainable, given their audience level and the costs involved. nobody would touch them in a privatised world and try and make money out of them. they re simply not commercially sustainable. so this isn t about making a kind of kneejerk defend the bbc case. this is about thinking about the rest of the radio industry, and how the commercial world would be affected. well, not only would all those bbc local and nation services close down the bbc networks collectively one, two, three, four and five could just about survive if they were prepared to cut their content costs by about 60%. well, good luck saving the good bits of the bbc that people know and love if you have to take 60% off the cost. and then the third leg of this is that the commercial sector if the bbc, if the networks were taking commercials, the commercial sector would suddenly find its own revenue base cut back by 10%, 15%, 20%.
of all, close down, i m afraid, bbc local radio and all the nations radio. they simply are not commercially sustainable, given their audience level and the costs involved. nobody would touch them in a privatised world and try and make money out of them. they re simply not commercially sustainable. so this isn t about making a kind of kneejerk defend the bbc case. this is about thinking about the rest of the radio industry, how the commercial world would be affected. well, not only would all those bbc local and nation services close down the bbc networks collectively one, two, three, four and five could just about survive if they were prepared to cut their content costs by about 60%. well, good luck saving the good bits of the bbc that people know and love if you have to take 60% off the cost. and then the third leg of this is that the commercial sector if the bbc, if the networks were taking commercials, the commercial sector would suddenly find its own revenue
so this isn t about making a kind of kneejerk defend the bbc case. this is about thinking about the rest of the radio industry, and how the commercial world would be affected. well, not only would all those bbc local and nation services close down the bbc networks collectively one, two, three, four and five could just about survive if they were prepared to cut their content costs by about 60%. well, good luck saving the good bits of the bbc that people know and love if you have to take 60% off the cost. and then the third leg of this is that the commercial sector if the bbc, if the networks were taking commercials, the commercial sector would suddenly find its own revenue base cut back by 10%, 15%, 20%. therefore, the commercial sector is making no money, all of the investment that the commercial sector has put into radio over the past ten, 15, 20, 25 years, really, as commercial has really grown in the last 25 years that s all for nothing, too. bbc radio is 100 years old t
school. pbs wasn t free either. pbs was at no immediate cost to the consumer. but content doesn t create itself. joy, and it certainly doesn t relate, good content costs. we license these books from the publishers. and we have a fiduciary responsibility to pay these artists and, and the writers, for, for their intellectual property. there are plenty of educational products in our schools that the school districts pay for. one of the thing that the we are doing, again the kick starter helps us do that, is to give the reading rainbow product for schools away. for schools that are in need. i think that s pretty significant. so the other trench of criticism has been, listen if you are going to invest, go on kick starter, better investment to increase literacy is do a small community really literacy focused programs rather than reading rainbow which is for kids who in theory can already read?