formerly president and would be the largest story in the political universe if it were about anyone else who has fewer legal problems. that is my factual introduction to the ongoing civil defamation and sexual assault/rape trial for donald trump. e. jean carroll alleges donald trump raped her in the 1990s. today is the sixth day of the trial and we are learning a lot as we are right in the heart of it. the jury also heard in a way from trump himself, but not live. instead, this jury, which is assessing these very serious allegations, heard from trump in a deposition that was taped in okay. now, there s no video of this new deposition available. we do know broadly what it looks like. it s a contrast to past depositions that trump faced. we also can tell you reporting today in what is a small portion of a 45-minute deposition was reported as evidence. this is something off the top i want to explain why it matters before i go any further. donald trump as a legal and political ma
afraid to make the mistake. to fail but get up and see how you can make it better or change it. but to keep moving forward. in asia, i had reached a certain audience level where i was very happy and in a good place. crouching tiger didn t bring me right away to that kind of roles because basically there were none of those kind of roles in america or in hollywood. and i was very fortunate that the bond movie tomorrow never dies, they decided together with roger, the director, that you know, bond also evolved. and the women that were inside in the bond movies were going to be comparable in that way and not just a fancy great name. so although james bond has only evolved slowly as a character. he might have more growing to do. yes. change always takes time,
bbc local radio and all the nations radio. they simply are not commercially sustainable, given their audience level and the costs involved. nobody would touch them in a privatised world and try and make money out of them. they re simply not commercially sustainable. so this isn t about making a kind of kneejerk defend the bbc case? no, absolutely. this is about thinking about the rest of the radio industry. absolutely. ..and how the commercial world would be affected? well, not only would all those bbc local and nations services close down, the bbc networks collectively i, 2 3, 4 and 5 could just about survive if they were prepared to cut their content costs by about 60%. well, good luck saving the good bits of the bbc that people know and love if you have to take 60% off the cost. and then the third leg of this is that the commercial sector. if the bbc, if the networks were taking commercials,
as well as having, i should say, a huge effect on bbc radio, were it to be ad funded you can. sorry to interrupt, but basically, you know, we could talk about we probably will end up talking about this licence fee over and over on the media show. we ll look at telly but, you know, in terms of radio, which you know about, are you suggesting that actually it might affect the whole of radio in the uk, notjust the bbc? yeah, my rough back of a cigarette packet calculation suggests that if you were to divest bbc radio in its totality from television as a result of tv going subscription only you would have to, first of all, close down, i m afraid, bbc local radio and all the nations radio. they simply are not commercially sustainable, given their audience level and the costs involved. nobody would touch them in a privatised world and try and make money out of them. they re simply not commercially sustainable.
bbc local radio and all the nations radio. they simply are not commercially sustainable, given their audience level and the costs involved. nobody would touch them in a privatised world and try and make money out of them. they re simply not commercially sustainable. so this isn t about making a kind of kneejerk defend the bbc case. this is about thinking about the rest of the radio industry, and how the commercial world would be affected. well, not only would all those bbc local and nation services close down the bbc networks collectively one, two, three, four and five could just about survive if they were prepared to cut their content costs by about 60%. well, good luck saving the good bits of the bbc that people know and love if you have to take 60% off the cost. and then the third leg of this is that the commercial sector if the bbc, if the networks were taking commercials, the commercial sector would suddenly find its own revenue base cut back by 10%, 15%, 20%.