Started teaching english there. Worked my way up the ladder. Then i thought, well, okay. Near the end of my career. I have one more mountain to climb, thats San Francisco. So im here in San Francisco, here in the bay area, and just really pleased to be at city college. How is that climb going . Youve been here two years. Give us an assessment what was youve been able to see and maybe fix if it needs to be fixed at city college. No, well first of all its just been the time of my life. Personally, the people of city college are great. We have a great board, great faculty, great staff. That college has been there since 1935. Its graduated 35,000 alumni. Its had a great reputation. So in the last couple of years, weve set our goals on three major things. Number one, students. We need to be student centered to make sure our students, most of whom are were aajority minority campus college. Need to graduate and move forward with their lives. Want to grow the college wide receiver we think we
Stakeholders and operators of this facility now and in the future. So, we certainly appreciated the opportunity to be able to come in here and assist tjpa in this effort and the scope that they have defined that well talk about. So the peer review process is a service that provides its members and others associated with the organization and it is a valuable resource. What it does is allows the opportunity to bring in highly experienced and knowledgeable professionals that are peers, you know, to the industry and really come and do a brief, deep dive into whatever the scope so we certainly appreciate the abilities for having our members be able to come in here and spend their time voluntarily and participate in these peer review processes. For the panel that conducted the peer review by reviewing documentation that was provided to us by tjpa, we did a we had some interviews and a series of briefings with staff and we also were able to go out and walk through the facility and really take
Stakeholders and operators of this facility now and in the future. So, we certainly appreciated the opportunity to be able to come in here and assist tjpa in this effort and the scope that they have defined that well talk about. So the peer review process is a service that provides its members and others associated with the organization and it is a valuable resource. What it does is allows the opportunity to bring in highly experienced and knowledgeable professionals that are peers, you know, to the industry and really come and do a brief, deep dive into whatever the scope so we certainly appreciate the abilities for having our members be able to come in here and spend their time voluntarily and participate in these peer review processes. For the panel that conducted the peer review by reviewing documentation that was provided to us by tjpa, we did a we had some interviews and a series of briefings with staff and we also were able to go out and walk through the facility and really take
Alternates. Il call roll. Director forbes. Here. Director baptiste. Present. Why director lipkin. Why present. Director syed. Present. Director tumlin. Present. Chair gee. Here. Directors we have quorum. Am item 3 is communications. Wield like to note process for the public to comment. Members of the public may comment on the meeting during Public Comment period in person or remotely. The call in line as a courtesy and may be disrupted due to technical difficulties. In person comment will be taken first. Remote comment after. The public call in line is on the agenda and dialing strukdzs should be scrolling at the bottom of the screen on sfgovtv. Are there communications. Next item. Item 4 is board of directors now and old business im not aware of any. Next item. Directors. Item 5 is the executive directors report. Executive directo van de water is here were excited bring in items to you that we have been planning on for over 2 years now. And these will advance the third and final leg o
Director chang and are alternates. Il call roll. Director forbes. Here. Director baptiste. Present. Why director lipkin. Why present. Director syed. Present. Director tumlin. Present. Chair gee. Here. Directors we have quorum. Am item 3 is communications. Wield like to note process for the public to comment. Members of the public may comment on the meeting during Public Comment period in person or remotely. The call in line as a courtesy and may be disrupted due to technical difficulties. In person comment will be taken first. Remote comment after. The public call in line is on the agenda and dialing strukdzs should be scrolling at the bottom of the screen on sfgovtv. Are there communications. Next item. Item 4 is board of directors now and old business im not aware of any. Next item. Directors. Item 5 is the executive directors report. Executive directo van de water is here were excited bring in items to you that we have been planning on for over 2 years now. And these will advance th