money that he hasn t spent on his campaign. it s also half the size of meg whitman s similar stunt in 2010. thanks to the fbi letter today, the stunt by trump today landed with sort of half of the splash of what whitman did back in 2010. but still, this is a patented trick. the patented last-minute cash infusion from the wealthy candidate confidence trick. it has now been played by donald trump. we ll see if it works. using 60,000 points from my chase ink card i bought all t framework. wi. and plants needed to give my shop. a face. no one will forget. e what t pow of poin can do for your business. len more achasm/ink
million short of the $100 million he was prepared to pony up for his campaign. so today s $10 million personal transfer from trump, it s a nice distraction from the amount of money that he hasn t spent on his campaign. it s also half the size of meg whitman s similar stunt in 2010. thanks to the fbi letter today, the stunt by trump today landed with sort of half of the splash of what whitman did back in 2010. but still, this is a patented trick. the patented last-minute cash infusion from the wealthy candidate confidence trick. it has now been played by donald trump. we ll see if it works. there s no one road out ere. no one surface. no one speed. no one way of dring on eh and everroad the mercedes-bz c-clas car that can coner them all, fi dving mes you customize the steeng, shift poand suspension to fit the mood youe in.
ideological, you can, or call it practical. they do see that they were having to make these big cuts because we got ourselves into a position whereby we could not finance the public services that we thought we could finance cause we are not as rich as we thought we were. and decided if something had to be done on a permanent and clear and bold basis to do to deal with that problem. now it is a fantastic risk, as martin said what is going to on here, i don t think you can deny that it is very clear and that people can see a sense of purpose in t economics is also about politics and is also about political confidence and it is perhaps a confidence trick but you can sometimes i think it extremely good at that, margaret thatcher, put her offer on the table, countervailing evidence, she would stick with it make some adjustment and see whether mr. cameron doesn t do that actually, saying are these cuts going to be delivered? let s see if they are delivered to the letter or the number
be done on a permanent and clear and bold basis to do to deal with that problem. now it is a fantastic risk, as martin said what is going to on here, i don t think you can deny that it is very clear and that people can see a sense of purpose in it. economics and it s all about political confidence. it is perhaps a confidence trick. but you can sometimes she was extremely good at that. she would put her offer to the table, there would be a lot of counteractive evidence, she would stick with it, make some adjustments. she was saying all these cuts will be delivered, let s see if they ll be delivered to the letter and number on the table at the moment. so you have to know what you re doing. there is i bit of envy for we have a clear start and a position on what we want to do. you worry a lot about these kul cuts because you see a lot of them getting into services of