I love it teenage waste land. We had to play that song. Perfect fit. Its perfect because first up we decided to cover a parenting topic we think crew going to find interesting because tiff fashioned herself measure of my three kids. No matter what side of the spectrum you are on. Are you a helicopter parent, are you opposite do you do everything for your kid or more like our first guest antihelicopter mom. Yes she is. Megan mccormick refuses to do for her kids why . Because shes my hero. Nonhelicopter mom. Welcome back megan mccormick. She has six kids to not helicopter. We were talking in the dressing room beforehand we were saying is it easier because we dress together. Although we clash you would never know we dress together. If you have more kids it is their business. Do you think you would have been the same if you only had one, two or three. I would have been smarter if i only had one, two or three. But since i do have six i have to live with the consequences. I dont know if it w
Could succeed as aviators. But they proved to be so good at their job that by the end of the war, their services were in high demand by white bomber pilots. While serving in a segregated military, these brave and historic pilots and their support teams fought farb itch abroad and racism at home. I recently had the honor of participating in the celebration of the Tuskegee Airmen at umassboston. Among the airmen honored that the event were Fighter Pilots george hardy both men served in world war ii, korea, and vietnam. Charles mcgee hold it is u. S. Air force record for most combat fight permissions ever flown. 409. Both men now in their 90s, are part of a dwindling group of Tuskegee Airmen. Here is part of my conversation with two of americas best. I tried to figure out what to do. By the time 1942 came, i knew i wanted to fly. The initial guys were college graduates, say. As the years went on, several years, they reduced to that high school graduates. They needed more pilots. More and
Doing in regards to cyber crime. Morally obligated to start out by saying i know im the last person between you and lunch and i will keep that in mind. I have 15 minutes, give or take for comments and a some time for q and a. I will hold up my side of the bargain and you have to hold of yours. Here we go. I will focus on four things. The current overall cyber threat, how see this threat impacting the Automotive Industry, what the fbi is doing to prevent and respond to cyberattacks and lastly, the importance of publicprivate sector collaboration and what do you or the industry can expect from the fbi if you suffer a breach or the victim of in a cap. With a little story. Everybody local a story about a meeting i went to in march of this year and it was with intel corporation. After this meeting was a commercial Futurist Panel and there were three individuals on the particular panel. One was Marc Andreessen from injuries and horowitz and peter getz. And jim all very successful in prominen
We are far from us age where this is normalized and far from a stage where everyone is comfortable. What we end up doing is saying, if your paradigm is to require background checks or Proof Positive identification, we can provide that. Nine times out of 10 what happens is the customer comes back and says, we get it. That helped us get started but it limited the pool. Now that we understand how this works, we are going to start to relax those things. It is a complicated subject. What it comes down to, optimizing for the level of trust whichever vendor it is. Whether required to get the thing going. That is the important piece. Dan does the Bug Bounty Program only focus on systems related to risks . Only system risk . Business Operational Risk . Marten that is a great question. We make sure anybody can submit vulnerabilities and anybody can receive them. Customers get Additional Services where we go in and write long reports with recommendations. We go as deep as they like to go. We want
Always had a justification for removing anyone that doesnt relate to our values. What we have found problematic is we have two values. Twitch is a platform for the creator. It is creator first. When there is a tension between the viewer and broadcaster, we go for the broadcaster because there needs to be a home online for them to have control and run their own editorial policy. We give them powerful tools to manage their community. That works great as long as youre dealing with broadcasters who all have excellent taste and the problem that arises is we want Good Behavior over the whole site. We want to give broadcasters power. They dont control the Community Well enough and you a lot about and you get a lot of bad action as a result of that. We have been spending a lot of time on this problem. But it is hard because the last thing we want to do to a creator is tell them that we know better than you how to run your community. That makes the problem much harder than just jumping into it