We have quorum today, and the following staff are in attenance [indiscernible] okay. Thank you craig. There is one change to the agenda. Well take two items out of order and well call item 10 portsmouth square before item 9, Patricia Green. From the original stated agenda. I like to welcome all persons to attend in person at 1 dr. Carlton b goodlett place, room 416. This meeting is streamed on s fgovtv. This grants technology for those listance, please be mindful tech related difficulties could incur which contribute to gaps and delays. Please know we are doing our best and ask for patience. At this meeting we are bound to follow the structural of our agenda and adhere to the best practice out in the Good Government guide. At every meeting there will be a opportunity for general Public Comment where members may comment on any item pertaining to this body. Public comment is taken in person with Remote Access provided for those who require ada accommodation. Respectfully, we ask your kee
Development unit. The question raised to have an expert on staff who is able to look demolitions more from an architect side, structural engineer, is there any way to augment that position by 1. 5 positions to do both . I think that the short answer, we think we have enough to financially support one person to just to be devoted to adu, but when those issues come up, other planners get involved. So Historic Preservation planner would look at if there is a preservation issue. At this point, the mayors budget request to all departments was not to add any positions so were pushing the envelope a little bit, because we think we can justify it based on the fees, but when the issues come up. I will take a little bit of exception to what ms. Hester said we just rubber stamp them, we spend a lot of time looking at them. The number of adu approved, we spent a lot of time looking at these issues when they do come in and Preservation Planners do look at them. My point is, there will be more than
Positions to do both . I think that the short answer, we think we have enough to financially support one person to just to be devoted to adu, but when those issues come up, other planners get involved. So Historic Preservation planner would look at if there is a preservation issue. At this point, the mayors budget request to all departments was not to add any positions so were pushing the envelope a little bit, because we think we can justify it based on the fees, but when the issues come up. I will take a little bit of exception to what ms. Hester said we just rubber stamp them, we spend a lot of time looking at them. The number of adu approved, we spent a lot of time looking at these issues when they do come in and Preservation Planners do look at them. My point is, there will be more than one person devoted to the work. Commissioner moore one additional question, the expenditure budget, i see capital and equipment, 19 fy 1920 to become zero and material and supplies increasing by 20
At this point, the mayors budget request to all departments was not to add any positions so were pushing the envelope a little bit, because we think we can justify it based on the fees, but when the issues come up. I will take a little bit of exception to what ms. Hester said we just rubber stamp them, we spend a lot of time looking at them. The number of adu approved, we spent a lot of time looking at these issues when they do come in and Preservation Planners do look at them. My point is, there will be more than one person devoted to the work. Commissioner moore one additional question, the expenditure budget, i see capital and equipment, 19 fy 1920 to become zero and material and supplies increasing by 200,000, that is a time when youre moving. Does that mean that youre not adding equipment and why is the number zero, i thought you would need a boost with new space, new equipment is happening, so you would want up to date equipment. We absolutely want uptodate equipment. Given the l
Any Public Comment from we vote on this . If i heard correctly youre going to approve the response to the civil grand jury report. Yes. It is very vague maybe well do it partially agree at some point consider that can. It would be more reinsuring if someone takes this on a a subcommittee like commissioner renne. The other comment. Im sure i didnt see the agenda the ginsburger matter. Theyve reminded me i didnt get a vote on approving the responses to the generalizing report item 5 before theres a motion and i will call the question. All in favor, say i. I. Opposed . Hearing none it is passed unanimously now it is item number 6 which is the ethics complaint regarding the alleged violations of the sunshine ordinances and i dont know is the complainant here . The record reflects the complainant was notified and is there anyone on behalf of respondent mr. Ginsburg good evening. Im aaron are the rec and Park Department to speak on this item ill be brief we urge you to adapt a represents for