Where i should say, we are not going to post this until october, when we get the complete data because at this point, most of the committee is formed after the semiannual statement was due. And so, this is part of a sneak peek of how this is going to work, at the top here, we have a list of all of these questions that i just read off on the presentation. And then, at the bottom here, we have a list of all of the measure and what do you is i can click on one of these questions and for instance, which Committee Support or oppose each measure and so you can click on it and it will display, each committee on the left here. And then, the position is indicated by the color, and so supporting committees are always labeled with orange, and the opposing committees are labeled with blue. And on the right here, i have a tool where i can change the measure that i want to look at so what i have to do is click on the smirs and rebuild all of the charts, and based on the measure that i chose and show
Most money, and just to pick on him, what i can do is i can actually click the search box and this is actually interactive and so i can actually just type in farrell, and it will rebuild the chart so that we can look at some of these smaller lines and see which firms are giving the smaller ones as well. And i say, okay, there is this 400 240u, for the association of realtors and lets say that i want to do more research on that and all that i have to do at the bottom is type in the realtors. And they ril rebuild the chart and show me all of the candidates that have received the contributions from the San Francisco association of realtors and so you have supervisor tang and weiner. If this, chart piques the interest of the user, they can actually do the Additional Research and dont have to trust my numbers and they can click it to the bottom and take it over to the website and they can either work with my chart or it will tell them what i based this chart on, and it will actually take th
This is the last section lobbyist ands their contribution to candidates. And so because they are required on a monthly basis to report any of the contributions that they are making or arranging or delivering. We have been the starts that are lifting to the local office in november and then right here, it shows all of the firms and what you can do, you can actually mouse over any candidate and it will display the firm and how much money they have been giving. And so you can see here, that mark far ill has received the most money, and just to pick on him, what i can do is i can actually click the search box and this is actually interactive and so i can actually just type in farrell, and it will rebuild the chart so that we can look at some of these smaller lines and see which firms are giving the smaller ones as well. And i say, okay, there is this 400 240u, for the association of realtors and lets say that i want to do more research on that and all that i have to do at the bottom is typ
Listed what they had done, including spending 300,000 on things that they had no Legal Authority to do so. Charging fees, that they had no Legal Authority and fire the cultural director and replace the head of the commission. The bottom line is if you were a commission and you were in charge of a staff and a staff screws up it reflects on you. You cant sit there and say, oh, if we find our executive director in violation, that has no reflection on us at all. Even though we turnover 99 percent of what we do to them, and in cases like mine, mr. St. Croix has a complaint against him and he gets to dismiss it on his own authority. And you dont call that some sort of a conflict of interest . The bottom line is you are here to insure that this process is an open process, and a fair process. I have heard a number of things here that i find totally discon certaining apparently miss herrick got her directions from mr. St. Croix or your staff. She has had conversationwise mr. St. Croix and the s
Possible action on the complaints. Mr. Chat field who is not here, wrote mr. Shaw in may, the Ethics Commission regularly handles referals from the task force, however it will not ajudd kate these matters, in both complaints. He repeated that in his confidential memo to mr. Shen and to mark kets of the District Attorney office. Because the allegation involves johnson and croy executive director of the commission, the agency cannot handle the matter. Period. The commission is engaged in the discussion with the various outside agency and so forth and so on. That was in august of last year. I did a record search of your files. I just came back from sitting in the commissions office. There is absolutely records of any kind relating to discussions with any other agencies. The references to the San Jose City Attorneys Office are dated 9 months after that. But i think what is really important is that there is a, i think, a reference in an email that it was mr. St craw who spoke to the City At