In february, 1980, muni metro were officially inaugurated. In that same year, muni received its first fleet of buses equipped with wheelchair lifts. In 1982 when the cable car had a shutdown, they added an alternative attraction to the cars. The festival was a huge hit and would continue for the next four summers in a permanent fline that would extend all the way to fishermans wharf, by 2000 the fline was in place. And in 2007 muni extended the third line to the southeast corner and returning to third street. For the first time in 60 years. In the course of last 100 years, munis Diverse Workforce forged by men and women of innovation have reflected the many cultures that flock to the city. Munis groundbreaking antidiscrimination has guaranteed equal opportunity for all. The citys policy mandates the course for the future, as they work diligently to increase options and increase multialternatives, and deduce reduce the carbon footprint. It continues to improve the systems. During this sen centennial year we reflect on the transit system. Driven not okay good morning. Everyone welcome to the San Francisco Budget Finance Committee for september 24, 2014, im mark farrell im joined by supervisor avalos and supervisor cowen and thank you jim smith and others amazements as yes, please sloindz all dies and files shall be submitted to 9 clerk and the agenda will be for the next meeting. Madam clerk item one. Resolution retroactively 30 years the department of Public Health to accept one hundred and 80 thousand inform participate in a program for the prevention of disease and for the monitoring of september 29, 2014, i believe we have dr. Making fare listen here. If you go to the next one it probably will be easier. I didnt prepare a big speech but the cdc has enlisted us with the National Response inform San Francisco project generally are helping them with household surveys with the aids academically and for the female sex workers and injection workers. Okay. Thank you colleagues any questions. We dont have a budget Analyst Report so Public Comment are there others who wish to speak item one seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Motion to move to item forward. Second well take that without objection. Madam clerk call item 2. Item 2 a resolution authorizing the department of Public Health to submit an application to reduce the funding for the administration requesting emergency relief for the metropolitan area for 2016 okay dean goodwin please come on up. Good afternoon supervisors this is part of our annual process of applying important the funds that make up half of our prospective at hiv 1 hundred address 36 million reflect our funding for 2000 the amount we received this year was 15. 45 million im here for questions. Thank you well open this up for Public Comment are there others who wish to speak on item 2 seeing none, Public Comment is closed. So moved approval. Supervisor mar we have a motion and second well take that without objection. Madam clerk call item 3. Is a resolution authorizing the department of Public Health to submit a one year application for a the center for decease control requesting 8 million for hiv prevention for 2015. Thank you very much another dph person to come and speak on this thank you. Good afternoon. Im john, i work for the Community Equality and Health Branch that is in the Public Health division that oversees those grants it is our main cd c that Fund Community organizations like the smf and funds mous like hiv testing in the clinic and community and provides a pass through through for marin this is the figure out of the fifth year 5 year grants and submitted a budget for 2015 not knowing the 2015 allocation what say is go to be colleagues questions or comments motion to send this item forward well take that without objection. Item 4 resolution approving an authorizing the Treasure Island Development Authority to enter into a modification of the corporate agreement with the United States navy to expend the agreement to september 30, 2015. Chair farrell meeting Treasure Island Authority Staff the item in front of the committee to extend the agreement for the United States navy for one year all conditions remain unchanged. Thanks very much colleagues questions or comments are there others who wish to speak item 4 seeing none, Public Comment is closed motion to send this item forward well take that without objection. Madam clerk call item 5. Is a resolution authorizing the experience of on agreement to extend it 5 years on monogrem street for Child Services in the fourth year for the period of january 1st, 2019. Im claudia the director of real estate in lieu of john updyke this is an extension of a lease that has had the department of Child Support services at 617 Mission Street since 1995 a 5 Year Experience of a option 5 year are warrant lease from january 1st, 2015, to january 1st, 2019, increasing the rent subsequentially thats because rent was low to from it to 95 percent of market thats still below market rent is fixed for the 5 year term it includes everything but Electricity Department of Child Support services is by the state and no rent for the city and unless you have questions thats it okay. Colleagues any questions okay mr. Rose to our budget Analyst Report please. Yes. Mr. Chair and members of the committee on page 3 of the our report we report that despite the 61 increase in rent according to the Real Estate Department this proposed rent is still below fair market value we do recommend you approve this resolution. Okay. Thank you, mr. Rose colleagues questions or comments okay much appreciated now well open this up for Public Comment are there others who wish to speak on 80 this item seeing none, Public Comment is closed motion to send this forward. So moved and well take that without objection. And madam clerk call item 6. Item 6 is a resolution approving an amendment to the sfmta to provide free muni service for kids enrolled in the unified School District. Good afternoon this it is diane this is a resolution to amend the 20152016 budget to provide free muni passes to 19 to 22 low low and moderate special education students at the district the district has monthly passes to the mta and weve been informed by the School District theyll be able to reindirect those fined to 0 another services and programs of mta board of directors depraved that on september 19th. Colleagues questions or comments first why not mr. Rose to our report we have a entertain a motion for a tech motion if you will. Mr. Chair and members of the committee on page 7 we report that providing free muni service by providing clipper cards to 19 to 22 low and moderate protect students enrolled in the special Education Services will reduce the sfmta one hundred and 63 thousand dollars annually they will be absorbed by the departments operating budget we recommend that you amend the proposed resolution to state the free muni service for clipper cards for 19 to 22 students enrolled in the special Education Program was dedicated for low to moderate students the sfmta advised us of their intent we recommend you approve the resolution as amended. Thank you, mr. Rose colleagues questions or comments well open this up for Public Comment on this item seeing none, why dont we close Public Comment it is now closed supervisor avalos. Ill go after you john. A question i have i know that were designating in terms of the amendment the analyzed amending to this to specify were sincerely 1923 to 22 years old that have a disagreement im wondering what the difference between that in terms of cost were going to have free muni program for all the people in the special ed program regardless of income so theres a major difference im asking this because there was a policy desire for the community that free muni would be free muni regardless of income thats one the advocacy points made this year by the muni that was lobbied lobbied i wanted to understand what the mta is putting forwards is there a repel difference between the program that will serve all people from special ed from 19 to 22 and were saying low to middleclass youth. The program is relatively small and would be a relatively small population from low to moderate in the School District. Do i have a sense of the difference if we were to be. Maybe 50 additional students. I guess by changing the language in the resolution are we actually changing the scope of the program if we dont include this is this language did that make a difference in the delivery of the service. The amendment being proposed by the budget analyst is an over set forth on our part to state to low to moderate income and this is consistent with our Exciting Program for free muni youth. And if we didnt make the amendment whats the difference. Without the language it would i think there would have to be a second fair amendment. John gibner, deputy City Attorney the board of supervisors doesnt have the authority to amend the mta board of directors budget resolution you could by 7 out of 11 vote reenth this Budget Amendment and the mta board could come back with Something Else but you cant change that by this resolution. In this case were asking for the amendment this amendment is actually making the resolution consistent with the program thats been designed by the mta. Right. Right which specifics the age group. So i think the budget analyst clarifies what the mta board has done whether or not you make that classification the mta boards resolution is what it is do okay supervisor mar. I was going to ask ms. Hamons for the free muni for low to moderate focus that passed through the mta in 2013 how did he define it i know that the demand Councilmember Alvarez said for the free muni for youth was for all students how do we define i i guess free and reduced lunch would be the easiest for low to moderate income. The definitions is one hundred percent in the bay area medium income significantly higher than the free to muni in this. Whats the bmi. So for a family of 497,000 and then i know theres commitments to extend to low to moderate seniors and know know what the recent budget 18years old were added in im just it looks like this is for special ed students ease their transitional age between 18 to or 19 to 22 what happened so the 18years old are already covered so you would. Yes. In the budget dilatation 9 board of supervisors approved the budget for the 18 years old and thats moving forward were in the process. Thank you. Thanks very much City Attorney can we describe it. Yes. John gibner, deputy City Attorney again under the charter the board of supervisors has limit the budget you can reject the budget or let it go into effect by not actressing or approve it by motion who what was introduced by the mta was a resolution to approve the budget but gives the mayor the right to veto but the mayor does not have a role in this process the budget before i would change this item from a resolution to another motion because its chula within the boards jurisdiction and add language around the sequa determination made by the among other things just to have a title in the body of the motion what i distributed includes the budget analysts recommended amendments by certainly could take that out. Thank you, mr. City attorney colleagues could we have a motion to accept the City Attorneys motion well take that without objection. Well have a discussion on the other item okay. Then the flooilg item as amended well take that without objection. Piety so moved. Madam clerk please call item 7. Item 7 is a resolution authorizing an increasing in the principle amount of the wastewater by 200 million not to exceed 500 million to the time by the Public Utilities commission in the wastewater entries. Im charles the deputy Financial Officer this is an increase for the Paper Program for the watermelon enterprise it is currently 300 million and requesting an increase of 2 hundred millions our water enterprise has a Paper Program of that 500 million level weve used it that to prefund our Capital Projects in between your long term financial he debt assurances i have a few slides to walk you through it if you time. Why not ask questions if we have them colleagues seeping mr. Rose our report please. Mr. Chair and members of the committee the requested increase in the pucs authorization of the enterprise paper commercial by 200 million not to exceed 42,300,000,000 to the request amount not to exceed 500 million will be used to finance 20142015 and resources and improvement prospective juror project that is identified in table one on page 10 of the report this is bridge financing and the sale of the enterprise Revenue Bonds in the spring of 2015 this policy with the issuance of commercial paper is consistent with the prior board of supervisors we recommend you approve the promoted resolution. Thank you, mr. Rose well open this up for Public Comment are there others who wish to speak on item 7 seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Okay. And we have a motion well take that without objection. Madam clerk call item 8. Item 8 is a resolution 30 years the execution and sense of a body between the city for a property located on 250 kearny street for chronically homeless folks for the 2014 for one size option to extend. Thank you madam clerk we have john updyke and have the people to speak who no matter be on jury duty to mr. Updyke. John updyke my colleague is doing his civil duty at jury duty and this is for kearny it is a 6 story one hundred and 36 unit single room occupancy development this has been newly complel rehabbed by current owners that join us sam and another sam this is a unique transitioned from two perspectives the terms ill go into in a moment and two the asset itself so in this case we have what is really a brand new asset with new infrastructure to new accelerators and the uniqueness of the sro is each unit has a separate boom and its not something we usually find this project is made possible by the citys participation in the 25 cities initiate a collaboration of cities across the United States the Veterans Affairs department hud and the International Council of homelessness all in a project to end chronicic homelessness this is a meaningful way towards that goal in this case, the transition requires the fiscal participation i want to stressing that the partnership from the va where arent with respect to their wrap around it is not Necessary Services and the hud you vouchers in the budget Analyst Report it was valued and a at onehundred 7 million of the first year of the overall extensions this is an Important Note without that partnership we wouldnt be here before you today the transition itself is at the 1,190 per unit weve capped it at 2 hundred and 5 thousand dollars per year thats air overall cost of maintenance that is the master leases it the typically capped at a per unit base it leads to fingerpointing how it it defined those caps have not proved use full since the budget Analyst Report was issued well pleased to report that ownership was agreed upon and a reduction over the first 10 year term to one percent rather than two percent that is modified but a 9 hundred thousand plus savings to the city ovsh over the term it has a 5 year renewal option subject to board approval ive joined by a host of folks that can answer questioning questions but want to bring up amanda to talk about the details of the project. Thank you. Good afternoon amanda freed from the office of hope but i did want to thank you for your consideration of the lease today . A extraordinary momentum to end veterans homelessness in San Francisco im joined by folks from the va and veterans themselves who came to speak about what this building means in terms of our fight for veterans homelessness i think youre familiar with the building its one of the most notorious building in San Francisco we were made out at how Many Police Officers said i did the most arrests in my history and great war stories i invite you to walk through the building its amazing to see the transformation i want to thank the va and the Housing Authority our local hud office and many colleagues from the sf a it is a tremendous effort because of the unique partnership that john spoke about one the things it addressed in the report but really an important consideration is the one hundred and thirty vets sited in this this are provided an amazing amount of services not quantified in this budget with every hyde voucher comes a waking up wrap around of benefits that is typically a 3 to one ratio most of the times veterans spend time on the grazing list but we want veterans back into the work and not social workers so bin by this project were enabling vets to come off the street who have the most significant barriers and giving them some significant infusion of services to help them stabilize into housing and move on to bigger and Better Things f this is the wave of the future we hope to go with our housing provisions in terms of the coordinated way were finding tenants for this building over the summer