That might biased the neutral Hearing Office r officers. Are there ways people can amealcan ameliorate the process. Its based on the Hearing Officer determining whether the director of transportation based his decisions on substantial evidence. What are some of the issues lacking in information . Not scums skips but in general. They have to have what . Substantial evidence wouldnt determine previous actions determined based on the straight document. The application kwrufl, itself, i did pull up the slide again and our so application had eight primary categories listed here in the bullets. The safety and device standards the pricing the Operations Plans to make sure scooters are available and distributed properly. And recharging maintenance and hiring and layer and experiencing qualifications and each had multiple subcategories defined in the application. So we had a total of 62 criteria across the eight categories rated. For a pass you need what 38 . 70 something, but i have a question
Maritime. Points to maritimel evaluation criteria will get poe reality is they may impute it. T a requirement from the pointing. On page 12 of the staff repoe the scoring criteria with more e saw on the slides. And if you ld 1e under quality of design devet submittal, 1b talks about perfot objectives which includes marite calls out this balance that comr makras is pointing out. I agreet talk about how they are weightee is called out. So how many people are goinge panel. At least four. And its in tt plan or include just a momen. I saw that. But is four a go . Dont you usually need an odd n . Well, theres scoring so i me was a tie i guess having a fifte good. And we left it open. But , it has development expert, porty member and person representing r regional interest. We thought in additional need, we could add ar expertise if needed. When is that decision going . Who is going to be included on . We would in our schedule g to begin to put names out there, have the rfps out on the street
Hello, madam chair. All right. Good morning, the meeting will come to order. Welcome to the october 18, 2019, special meeting of the Public Safety and Neighborhood Services committee. I am supervisor rafael mandelman. We are expecting vice chair stefani to arrive, our clerk is john carroll. Thank you, mr. Carol. I want to thank charles and jason at s. F. G. Tv for staffing this meeting. Machin please ensure youve silenced your cell phones, and your completed speaker cards should be submitted to the clerk. Items acted upon today will appear on the october 29thd of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. Id like to take item two first and then one and then three. So, mr. Clerk, could you please call item two. Item two is an ordinance amending the health and Business Code to replace the requirement that food preparations and Service Establishments post a symbol issued by the department of Public Health, and a placard indicating whether the establishment has conditionally passed or fai
Maritime. Points to maritime. So all evaluation criteria will get points. The reality is they may impute it. But it is not a requirement from the pointing perspective. On page 12 of the staff report, we outline the scoring criteria with more detail than we saw on the slides. And if you look at 1b and 1e under quality of Design Development submittal, 1b talks about Performance Trust objectives which includes maritime and 1e calls out this balance that commissioner makras is pointing out. I agree it doesnt talk about how they are weighted but maritime is called out. So how many people are going to be on the panel. At least four. And its in the waterfront plan or include just a moment. I saw that. But is four a good number . Dont you usually need an odd number . Well theres scoring so i mean if there was a tie i guess having a fifth would be good. And we left it open. But at a minimum it has development expert, port advisory member and person representing city or regional interest. We tho
Minority leader harry reid congratulated chris murphy for leading the 15hour debate against gun violence on wednesday in the senate. His remarks were followed by Mitch Mcconnell criticizing senate crast democrats for the debate calling it a talkathon. This is 20 minutes. Mr. President . For 14 hours and 50 minutes, beginning Late Wednesday morning and ending early thursday morning, the entire nation watched the senator from connecticut teach our republican colleagues a lesson and another things not the least of which is courage. It is easy to say we stood for 14 hours. We talk a lot about filibusters in the senate. They dont happen very often. I have been in congress for 34 heres and i have probably led two more than anyone else. They dont happen much. There are a lot of fake filibusters but this was real. I admire and appreciate the junior senator from connecticut very much. Four days after 49 innocent americans were gunned down in a nightclub, senator murphy stood here as indicated f