Commissioner matsuda that expected to be absent first on your junked is Public Comment please be advised the ringing of and use of cell phones code please be advised that the chair may order the removal from the meeting room of any person s responsible for the ringing or use of a applying if you have the one speaker card richard and good afternoon commissioners my name is rishtd rothman i want to talk about measure rallies mile favorite subject the commission the assessment started on the building at the zoo and hopefully, well on houch that will cost and to reopen the building the murals except for that the western wall they look fantastic and the other issue the skubtd mural the George Washington high school that makes the coit tower the most concentration of the murals is at George Washington it is not National Landmark so working with supervisor eric mars and heritage and your staff we can bring this about and fix up those about how far murals and get the recognition that those mur
Earthquake so everything is fine. Is that true . Loma prieta was different. The ground acceleration here was quite moderate and the duration was moderate. So anyone that believes they survived a big earthquake and their building has been tested is sadly mistaken. We are planning for the bigger earthquake closer to San Francisco and a fault totally independent. Much stronger than the loma prieta earthquake. So people who were here in 89 they should say 3 times as strong and twice as long and that will give them more of an occasion of the earthquake we would have. 10 percent isnt really the threshold of damage. When you triple it you cross that line. Its much more damage in earthquake. I want to thank you, harvey, thanks pat for p. Good afternoon, well call this meeting ftd Historic Preservation commission to order. Welcome to the San Francisco Historic Preservation Commission Regular meeting for october 15, 2014. I would like to remind the audience the commission does not tolerate out
Agenda is general Public Comment. At this time members of the public may address the commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission. Each member of the public may address the commission for up to 3 minutes. I have no speaker cards. Thank you, any member of the public wish to speak on an item not on the agenda . Seeing none we will close Public Comment. Which places us on department matters. Item 1, director report. Tim fry, department star. The directors report was included in your packets. Happy to answer any questions if you have any at this time. I see no questions. Well move on. Commissioners, that will place you on item 2, Planning Commission staff report and announcements. Tim fry again, department staff. Just a couple items to share with you. Since your last hearing two items at the Planning Commission, on october 2nd. First is the commission received this commissions letter suggesting the retention of the facade o
Having a conversation about what he can do in very much. Thank you very much. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Thank you, supervisors fewer time kurt im speaking in support of getting the lease before i gone about this and that ma cleaner park is extremely beautiful i was there i was there twice we had a golfing activity event where we visit children and people to the exultant to participate it was a fun time and good time as my executive director said it is quite an enthralling experience for the golf activities and golfing that goes around it the vial aspect of watering the ear and the aspect of engaging children not only those who are 18 and older but under my whole thing why im in support this is an opportunity to give you the supervisors a chance to be creativity and innovative not only with the fact it is golfing but the fact youre going to engagement families and rec and park and gave me the laborers and various aspects of San Francisco so im in support of this if you have any q
Like i said, i really appreciate your comments, mr. Fry, which are detailed quite specifically, but then we get to Something Like the civic Center Inventory and other things and all it says is so and so spoke and this is what the commission decided. So im wondering because i would think thats where we would want to pick up a lot of the issues that weve discussed to make sure they are portrayed accurately. I dont know if theres a reason that thats not done. Maybe you can. Just always been the practice. The minutes, requirement for the minutes is to indicate who spoke, whether or not they were in favor or in opposition or neutral to the project. We indicate those with minus signs and the plus signs, and then we very briefly paraphrase what the person said. Without actually transcribing verbatim what a person says i worry that we may not provide what the person said or the intent of the person, what the person said accurately and, to be quite honest, it would be a tremendous amount of wor