He also founded craigslist, the online Bulletin Board where i sell my discarded swimwear. Last night, tucker revealed the study was in fact no study at all. Can we get some numbers on that, and why you . No, actually, we cant. In the words of the study, pinning down precise proportions of censorship is impossible because twitter doesnt release sufficient data. Are you following the reasoning here . Their conclusion, twitter is not biased and we can be certain its not biased because twitter refuses to release the data on who it bands. Greg in other words, a fake study for a guy who claims he doesnt like fake news. It was designed for the media so they wouldnt have to do their jobs and investigate the actual claims, but the research is about as a researchy as turning on the lights to your living room to assess the existence of whales. Yep, no whales there. Really, having a Big Tech Lib Fund A Study On Whether big tech is biased, thats like me finding a study on how great i am, or a study
the vice president and almost every lawmaker was inside and when everybody knew there was going to be a rip a rally expected at the capitol that day . coming up tonight, the person serving as the capitol police chief on january 6 will join us and help answer that question. it s a truly important question as they said at the time, the january 6 committee, they had t predetermined outcome to go after donald trump and bludgeon him as much as possible bird that s why congressman jim jordan, congressman jim banks were off the committee, they were kicked off the committee and only members that impeached delmo trump were allowed on the committee. not exactly a fair committee. democrats are not interested in learning how that capital was breached, why security failed s badly, but here is the saddest part to me in it should be the whole country. that is this whole saw god is the. key and important information that we know about intelligence that they had that was being ignored in the
jacqui: i m jacqui heinrich, more details on suspect and his past. he s expected to be arraigned on tuesday. christina coleman with the latest developments, hi, christina. christina: we are here in front of the home of the philosophies and you can see there s very easy access to it and that unfortunately is what the suspect took advantage of. paul pelosi suffered fracture to skull and injuries to right arm and hands, fortunately he s expected to make a full recovery. he s expected to be okay. he underwent a successful surgery to repair the school fracture yesterday. house speaker nancy pelosi arrived at san francisco general hospital to be with husband, was in washington, d.c. during the attack. yesterday president biden condemned the attack and he also commented on paul pelosi s condition. i spoke to the speaker, she said that he s doing okay. he went to the hospital, was operated on and he seems to be coming along well. he s in good spirit and the whole family is there. c
startling details. the devil is in the details. donald trump had no basis, no reason, no legal basis to retain those documents at mar-a-lago. there could be numerous others that are charged, not just donald trump, as well as additional crimes that could be charged. is she kidding me? now, she might be getting that idea from one of the small parts of the affidavit that was curiously left unredacted. like on page 30 where it referred to president trump and those around him as, quote, criminal parties. but still didn t provide any evidence to prove it. it also warned that releasing the affidavit would give trump and his team the opportunity to flee or destroy evidence stored electronically or otherwise. flee? really? trump s plane has his name on it. and destroy electronic evidence. do they mean something like doing, i don t know, deleting 33,000 e-mails? we re going to get into that more in moments with our legal panel. but if anyone thinks that the doj is an impartial
sod a lot oque franf really ine and quite frankly, startling d details. et d the devilon is inal the deo and i ll trump had no basis, no reason, no legal basis to retain those documents at mart r a lago. e there could be numerous there could be numerous just donald trumadp as well as additional crimes that coulds be charged. hee getting th is she kidding me? now, she mightat be getting tht idea from one of the smalls parts of the affidavit that was curiously left unredacted likerr on page thirty . we re referring to presidentum trump and p and those around hi quote, criminal parties, but stilstl didn t provide any evidence to prove it. it also warned that t releasinthgs team the affidavit would give trump and his team the opportunity to flee t or destroy evidence stord electronically and otherwise fleed . on really, trump s plane has hisan name on itde and destroyhing electronic evidence. do they mean doing something like, i don t know, deleting lit thirty three thousa