he has at least 14 prior arrests on his record. that is that is not the only shocking crime. carley: ashley strohmier has more. ashley: carley, the niece of that victim actually said she was shocked that this happened because of the lengthy rap sheet that i will get to. they are upset and shocked. police charge 55-year-old [indistinct] with attempted murder and they evaluated and charged him based on evidence they had. a homeless man positive charges were downgraded to third-degree assault and second-degree harassment. the victim was sucker punched and hit his head on the concrete leaving him with a brain bleed and a broken cheek. on probation for sexually consulting a teen. nick adams questioned the bail reform laws which allowed the revolving door for criminals to get back on the streets. arrested 14 times including 1994 control assault on a minor. the suspect accused of beating a cabdriver is facing manslaughter charges. he allegedly fatally beat a 52-year-old after re
involving donald trump and hillary clinton. potentially because of political bias. unfortunately, we still don t know exactly what the fbi was searching for and we don t know the justification behind the raid. as gregg jarrett put it in a piece on foxnews.com, quote, the doj s redacted trumpet raid affidavit revealed precious little. earlier today former president trump reacted on truth social writing, quote, nothing mentioned on nuclear. a total public relations subterfuge by the fbi and doj or our close working relationship regarding document turnover. we gave them much. the big question tonight, where does it all go from here? joining us with analysis, the author of the price of principle. harvard law professor alan dershowitz along with former u.s. attorney brett tolman and fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett. thank you for joining us. you are a former u.s. attorney. i will start with you. i cannot get past the fact that a judge less than two months ago had to recuse the
startling details. the devil is in the details. donald trump had no basis, no reason, no legal basis to retain those documents at mar-a-lago. there could be numerous others that are charged, not just donald trump, as well as additional crimes that could be charged. is she kidding me? now, she might be getting that idea from one of the small parts of the affidavit that was curiously left unredacted. like on page 30 where it referred to president trump and those around him as, quote, criminal parties. but still didn t provide any evidence to prove it. it also warned that releasing the affidavit would give trump and his team the opportunity to flee or destroy evidence stored electronically or otherwise. flee? really? trump s plane has his name on it. and destroy electronic evidence. do they mean something like doing, i don t know, deleting 33,000 e-mails? we re going to get into that more in moments with our legal panel. but if anyone thinks that the doj is an impartial
trump and hillary clintoasen, yn potentially because ofto political bias. so unfortunatelypotentiall, we a don t know exactly what the fbis was searching for and we don t know the justification behind the raid as great jarretnd thett it in a piece on fox news .com, quote, the doj redacted trumpdad rade affidavit revealed precious little in earlier today.e in earlier former president trump reacted. soc on truth social writing, quote,l nothing mentioned on nuclear. a total public relations subterfuge by the fbi and doj or our close working relationship regarding document. turnover. we g so the bigav question tonight, where does it all go from here? well, joining us now wit with analysis, the author of the price of principle, harvard law professor alan dershowitz, along with former us attorney brad tolman and fox news legal d analyst greg jared. gentlemen,x ne thank you for joining us . brad , you re former u.s. attorney. i want to start with you will starti cannot get past thet
sod a lot oque franf really ine and quite frankly, startling d details. et d the devilon is inal the deo and i ll trump had no basis, no reason, no legal basis to retain those documents at mart r a lago. e there could be numerous there could be numerous just donald trumadp as well as additional crimes that coulds be charged. hee getting th is she kidding me? now, she mightat be getting tht idea from one of the smalls parts of the affidavit that was curiously left unredacted likerr on page thirty . we re referring to presidentum trump and p and those around hi quote, criminal parties, but stilstl didn t provide any evidence to prove it. it also warned that t releasinthgs team the affidavit would give trump and his team the opportunity to flee t or destroy evidence stord electronically and otherwise fleed . on really, trump s plane has hisan name on itde and destroyhing electronic evidence. do they mean doing something like, i don t know, deleting lit thirty three thousa