there are sometimes people who come in or would parachute into the bubble and see something that was happening as news or as a big deal that, you know, those of us who were on the road every day understood wasn t such i ll pick up with ryan when we come back. what drove was there one story, one incident his mine personifies the problem from the campaign standpoint, one story that drove you nuts like nothing else that came off the road. [ male announcer ] this is jim,
colleagues at the white house the i will say from the moment of the attack, the president was focused on two changes. the making sure our embassies were secure, but, also, getting to the bottom the attack . shepard: he went to a fundraiser the next day. guest: you doing your job 24 hour as day you know that. sow getting intelligence. you working on it. the second thing he was getting to is getting to the bottom of the attack and finding who was responsible and write them to justice. shepard: the suggestion is from the campaign standpoint the numbers down on foreign policy, however the attack on diplomatic mission in libya slightly but noticeably chipped away at the lead. would the campaign have preferred maybe they not put susan rice out to tell us something that the intelligence sources said was wrong. guest: the campaign doesn t have anything to do with decisions like that. those are decisions for the white house. when you have a tragedy that
members of the united states congress, people in imported positions of power who are pointing fingers at individuals working in this government making allegations or spreading innuendo about them without any direct evidence. they re dragging people s names and reputations through the mud. these are the five members of congress we re talking about. over the weekend, they ve got a new and powerful ally seem. he refers to congressman bachman and the others as the national security five. he blames political correctness to the threat. he goes on. the national security five are doing their duty and asking difficult questions designed to make america safer. asking the difficult question, he says. he says that critics are the five, in his words, the kind of willful blindness that keeps america at risk. now, they ve named these two to investigate muslim brotherhood infiltration. on the left is a member of president obama s homeland security advisory council. on the right is hillary cl
and other places. i ve seen the horrible things they ve done overseas and in this country as weapon. later in the broadcast, we re going to look at the role foreign jihadists are playing in syria right now. i m not defending radical islamists nor am i naive to their beliefs. but what i am talking about is people working in this government making allegations or spreading innuendos about them without any direct evidence. they re dragging people s names and reputations through the mud. here are the five people we are talking about, michele bachmann, trent franks and others. newt gingrich refers to the others as the national security five. he blames american elites for being blinded to the political threat. it verges on a psychosis. he goes on, the national security five are doing their duty and asking difficult questions designed to make america safer. we think you deserve a look at the people they ve been targeting and the tactics they ve been using. they ve named these two ask
syria now. i m not defending radical jihadists. nor am i naive to their intentions or beliefs. sitting members of congress, people in important positions of power, who are point fingers at individuals working in the government making allegations or spreading innuendo about them without any direct evidence. they re dragging people s names through the mud. these are the five members of congress who we re talking about. michele bachmann, thomas rooney and lynn west moreland. over the weekendhey got a new and powerful ally it seems, newt gingrich. he refers to congresswoman bachmann and the others as the national security five. he blames american elites for being blinded by political correctness. the level of self-deception necessary to misunderstand the muslim brotherhood, gingrich writes, verges on psychosis. asking difficult questions designed to make america safer. asking the difficult questions. remember that phrase. he says critics of the five represent the kind of willful