gear? it almost seems implausible from the start. yes, yes. because with the airport security being the way that it s supposed to be, he should security at the airport is supposed to be much tighter than what it is. and with these kids these days getting in and out of these airports and it s not just kids. it s grownups also that i ve heard. and i m just trying to figure out what security is doing at these airports that they can t catch these people. because what if it was a terrorist or a something even more traumatic of just kids getting in there? and i mean, these kids, of course, you re the mother of one of these children. yes. you have lost your son. we don t have all the details about this latest case, but it sounds like this particular boy, jonnette, walked away. i mean,
who was in control of that airplane. reporter: the passengers themselves could help resolve the mystery. if you can retrieve bodies and examine the respiratory tract, one of the first things you look for is the presence of soot. finding soot below the level of the larynx would be a good indication of a fire. reporter: but if the cabin was depressurized before a fire passengers would most likely pass out. there would be no evidence of trauma to the body or something that you could see on autopsy if in fact there was a decompression at high altitude. reporter: evening passengers cell phones and electronics might help tell the story of what happened if the plane is found searchers hope enough is left to fill in the blanks and solve the mystery. miguel marquez, cnn, perth. why one piece of debris matters so much. still to come, we re going live to the scene of the south korean
assumptions. what was that analysis? why did they say the plane was here in the first place? arthur, there has not been a single piece of debris found. that is why these reports and these stories, you saw the facial reaction on the prime minister of australia. there are people and family members who are very seriously asking that question because there has been no proof to the contrary. look, the bottom line is that it s certainly understandable why people are saying what they have gone, may have gone the northern route and is intact. or beached on an island in the indian ocean. that s another one. but we do have the inmarsat data, the radar data with performance data. well also have the pings. all of these coalesce in an area that shows a likely crash zone for the airport. i say if this plane landed intact or somewhat intact, which it may have done, it was in the south indian ocean. right. so intact could be in the ocean.
up 1.9 billion videos, youtube is not celebrating. don t light those birthday candles just yet we ll celebrate youtube s ninth anniversary in may when youtube.com became public. but they re paying homage to that first video in may. but there is plenty to say about this and a jar. one poster spoke for us all when he said i m watching a dog in a suit eating peanut butter. what am i doing with my life? you re watching finger lickin good, animal videos, jeanne moos, cnn. i can t even choose, but obviously i have to choose the camel one, but i don t know, that is hard to choose. anyway, there is going to be lots more of those where those videos came from. currently 100 hours of videos are uploaded to youtube every