Wont do that after the meeting is called. First item is approval of the minutes. So moved. Second. Roll call vote. [inaudible] ms. Fewer. Here. Ms. Mendoza mcdonnell. Yes. [inaudible] ms. Norton. Yes. Mr. Walton. Yes. [inaudible] mr. Haney. Yes. Seven ayes. The next item is the interim superintendent report and the first one. Thank you mr. Haney and if i commissioners would indulge me tonight i wanted to share some perspective as i take the roll of the interim superintendent for the first time officially in this Board Meeting tonight so this is an usually long comments on my part and i want to do it in two part and one is share some Broad Perspective and also some exciting reports about two events, one of which took place earlier this week last night and another one on saturday both at Mission High School as part of the africanamerican and Leadership Initiative and first i want to start by thanking audio is not clear and i want to thank superintendent carranza for his leadership and he
Objective third party accord toog city planning standard and believe it is accurate. Just trying to look at your plans. You got that setback on the third floor against the park of like 3 foot 7 where the master bedroom is. Im looking at page 3 of your plans in our package. Jes yes if that is extending ed to had walk in closet and that is adjusted and shortened to where the bedroom is, to give a sense what does that to do to the shadow . If you look at the shadow pattern and typically going cast toward the north and towards the east as the sun was sinking in the southwest. What you are talking about will reduce a nominal corner oof that shadow that may fall outside the baseline of the north side the tennis court. Im speculating, but looking at the shadow, the new shadow will take the shape the building. You with see that. What you are suggesting would cut the corner off that shadow. It would nt be an enormous impact. I dont think think there is net benefit to the public. That is a issue
Trading day. The Market Action is fairly mixed. It has been choppy. Green out of the gate to negative, back up and down and right now, the s p 500 is down by about 1 10 of 1 . We are off our session highs as well. The nasdaq is up just a tad there after what is happening with google. Hop into my terminal and i want to show you the function and you can see just how mixed we are right now. We did see a couple of these sectors turning to the green. The red. Re was in utilities down by 1. 9 . Real estate also down. These sectors are dependent on what happens with Interest Rates , also the chances of Interest Rate movement. Because of that, these are definitely seeing a fall. The financials are of the most by a tenths of a percent. In terms of choppiness of the day, out of the gates, here we are. Because of the rising probability of Interest Rates fund ou folly are fed follow your fed fund future. Unds, we are in the middle lets look at what is happening in terms of loan stock. These shares
You think what were talking but here is the end of capitalism . That the Banking System is gotten to the point where we cant accept a market economy with banks that are privately owned . Mr. Kashkari not at all. The market economy is still the key to our future. We just need to have a market economy where you can have a prosperity, and innovation, and take up some of the risk of collapse of the table. Pretty briefly, why now . Yourhy you in terms of leading on this issue . I just started, so im going as fast as i can. I feel at what i bring to this is a unique perspective. Of few people on the front line responding to financial crisis. That really colors my thinking and my views as i look at what has been implemented. Does have a the fed lot of expertise in large banks. I think bringing these things together to say i think we can do more, lets go do more, the last thing i would say im repeating myself there are a lot of experts around the country that have strong ideas about this. Have
United states, and we are grateful not only for his service, but for his family service. About what is supposed to happen now. When there is a vacancy on the Supreme Court, the president of the United States nominates someone. The senate is to consider that nomination. Either they disapprove of that nominee or that nominee is validated to the Supreme Court. Historically, this has not been viewed as a question. Theres no unwritten law that says it can only be done on off years. That is not in the constitutional text. Im amused when i hear people who claim to be strict interpreters of the constitution suddenly reading into it a whole series of provisions that are not there. Theres more than enough time for the senate to consider, in a thoughtful way, the record of a nominee that i present, and to make a decision. With respect to our process, we will do the same thing we did with respect to justice kagans nomination and Justice Sotomayor s nomination. We will find someone who was an outst