You think what were talking but here is the end of capitalism . That the Banking System is gotten to the point where we cant accept a market economy with banks that are privately owned . Mr. Kashkari not at all. The market economy is still the key to our future. We just need to have a market economy where you can have a prosperity, and innovation, and take up some of the risk of collapse of the table. Pretty briefly, why now . Yourhy you in terms of leading on this issue . I just started, so im going as fast as i can. I feel at what i bring to this is a unique perspective. Of few people on the front line responding to financial crisis. That really colors my thinking and my views as i look at what has been implemented. Does have a the fed lot of expertise in large banks. I think bringing these things together to say i think we can do more, lets go do more, the last thing i would say im repeating myself there are a lot of experts around the country that have strong ideas about this. Have
United states, and we are grateful not only for his service, but for his family service. About what is supposed to happen now. When there is a vacancy on the Supreme Court, the president of the United States nominates someone. The senate is to consider that nomination. Either they disapprove of that nominee or that nominee is validated to the Supreme Court. Historically, this has not been viewed as a question. Theres no unwritten law that says it can only be done on off years. That is not in the constitutional text. Im amused when i hear people who claim to be strict interpreters of the constitution suddenly reading into it a whole series of provisions that are not there. Theres more than enough time for the senate to consider, in a thoughtful way, the record of a nominee that i present, and to make a decision. With respect to our process, we will do the same thing we did with respect to justice kagans nomination and Justice Sotomayor s nomination. We will find someone who was an outst