today part of the law and it s up to the newspapers to pick and choose what they re going to publish. a responsible newspaper is not going to publish the location of safe houses, the names of spies and weapons programs but the very publication of some of these super secret and very, very important some of them programs certainly do risk our national security. i think there s exaggeration on both sides. i do think that those that claim that this is the end all be all and stop all terrorism are overstating it. i also think those that think this is the end of the world from a civil liberty s point of view are overstating it. we have video cameras on every corner, that s very intrusive and that caught the boston bombers. we already have mail watchers do you remember what letters are? i heard of them. the government had the right to determine whether the mail was coming from, where it was being sent to. so this is not something new. what s new is the massiveness of it. the fact that w
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20130617:03:05:00
comparemela.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from comparemela.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
will get it too. we need to be smarter about that as consumers. is it a fair assessment to say there is a difference? it eludes to something you say before. we have cameras around on every street corner and we know that and there s companies monitoring our shopping preferences and we have to even if we never read the agreement, we do agree at some point but have we agreed that our government can keep that information? a public super market can prosecute me. the department of justice can. maybe i m more willing to give that information to the super market than i am to the department of justice. there s no question about that. we know, too, that the younger generation is prepared to give up their privacy for community. they care more about community which is why they re prepared to live their lives openly on facebook. but they don t want the government to have that material. now i like what somebody said previously and that is this makes an enormous amount of sense in trying to sol
none of them are people lose confidence in the data and the old crying wolf syndrome, right? according to angel even big brother faces road blocks. if the government wants to track you, its ability to gather all sorts of private data and to analyze it at massive facilities like this nsa data center still under construction in utah will allow them to do it. there is no human reading going through and looking at your e-mails. it is possible. it is only going to look at things the computer throws out as interesting or important. it is the interaction between cold data and live humans where the synergy takes place. if the failure to connect the dots before the boston bombings was a case where the investigators misread the data it was a different story when the investigators had a more specific idea what to look for. they combed through countless photographs and hours of footage not only allowing them to zero in on the bombers but