Including the telecommunication industry prior to drafting the specifications and ill mention including the other municipal pope folk in the public works well publish those for 45 days and have another Public Meeting to talk about the proposed rules in detail and all prior to the directors final rules for implementing the directives thank you. I have questions for technology this will implement questions for the department as well as thank you for that presentation im glad were moving forward i think this is a long overdue issue i will be honest i dont think that legislation should have been necessary to get us here i think that we its been indentsly frultd between pg e and were keeping things up and not laying a new conduit and ill be blunt in my view its part of the technology they should have been working and dpw should have been working together and it didnt require legislation although apparently we need to do that to make sure this happens its frustrating to me i dont know how ma
Question about where particular technical concerns will cause us to you know defer to other departments i think part of our focus is going to be to really challenge every assertion ive heard those we dont have those to connect with water and sewer if theres an emergency well dig up the fiber and will cause great construction and well have to repave the lanes instead of the trench. Theyre going to tell you urge you to have to replace the whole pavement im sorry to interrupt you by i work with all the departments i have a lot of respect for them but we see with the Pedestrian Safety improvements i cant count the number of that times one Department Tells another department iceberg to pay to move the entire you water this makes it economically unfeasible and have push back to every objection and everything that can be raised until its escalated to dies on the vine i have a concern dp has not done this in the past im not trying to be critical but dp has mothers been proactive even it would
Doesnt compare well, to other cities amendment so i say all this in the context i know that d t will be issuing the registration and d t will have the discretion and ill have question about the 9 linear feet and d t will there that and also to issue a lot of regulations that could potentially limit the unanimous of conduit authenticity laid and give the past track record i have concerns that d t may minimize the where its budget concerns or logical or onsite others departments are this and that problem and the automatic response well, if any departments obtains well not move forward and to me we need to think laying this anywhere where its possible without teacher of the year ulcer up the streets can you talk about my concern expressed given the track record and explain why i shouldnt be concerned and in to the. Well, i think one thing weve looked at the legislation we have not talked about it its critical especially with the other your questions about the multiplees varieties its in t
And were going to challenge every assertion of the costs and every concern i understand your president ial you at this point none of those depends are going to be proelz are not values concerns but we can mitigate those. Im not saying their frivolous concerns we have to concern how do we solve that concern so the two points in that regard or one i think that the Mayors Office has a huge rule in to play here i see mr. Xhaup we designated the Mayors Office i hope theyll play a role and i guess the second point to you wonder if its im sorry president chiu is there a reporting requirement here if there recent a periodic reporting requirement where the department of item has to report to the mayor and the board of supervisors on a quarterly basis hear all the basic hear the opportunities we had and the opportunity we took and declined and heres the opportunities we took but the other departments objected. 50i8d to entertain an amendment. Is that not good enough. John gibner, deputy City Att
Get to that were to progressive harder of everybody else. We have supervisor kims districts thats at gridlock. We have some technical matters for gridlock but youre right. I think whats that i think you cant use it. Im sorry it was just a joke. I agree i think the smarter approach would be like the other programs phase it in and pilot it and study the information. It has and will show theres an a positive benefit for the economy so when we see that sort of pilot approach it allows us to have the comfort approach has we as the community and the Public Agency allows us to see how it moves along it may not work in all parts of the city but some type of management it in San Francisco we have five or six different tools i think the big part of it we lose out when we want to implement those strategies is we havent brought the public along but we have to change Public Opinion we cant rely on the gridlock to do that. If we have a plan to bring people along because the eludes vary across the ci