was that too abrupt a turn? you can t hold back the joy that you are talking out and i respect it. i like the week as i do respect the conversation you have with jessica valenti, also an important conversation join your weekend when your show is exactly. thank you, my friend. you enjoy yours. and thank you for all you at home for joining us this evening. it was a 2005 primetime emmy awards. everybody loves raymond won that year for best comedy. j.j. abrams lost, won for best drama, and also this happened. donald trump, shouting his way through a duet of the green acres theme song, alongside uncomfortable meghan malawi. don t ask me why. nobody asked for it. green acres had been off the air for 34 years by that point but still it happened and it was the weirdest most unfortunate musical collaboration that donald trump had ever been involved in until today. today, former president donald trump released a new song. correct a song. correction, a song
saving you up to 60% a year. and it s only available to comcast business internet customers. so boost your bottom line by switching today. it was a 2005 primetime emmy comcast business. powering possibilities. awards. everybody loves raymond won that year for best comedy. j. j. abrams lost won for best drama, and also this happened. donald trump, shouting his way through a duet of the green acres theme song, alongside an uncomfortable megan mullally. don t ask me why. nobody asked for it. green acres had been off the air for 34 years by that point but still it happened and it was the weirdest most unfortunate musical collaboration that donald trump had ever been involved in until today. today, former president donald trump released a new song. correct a song. correction, a song. and correct a song. the title is justice for all. it features donald trump or reciting the pledge of allegiance while the national anthem is sung by a backup chorus of january 6th de
the brady motion scenario with the defense. and i think with a judge you know, i was court ruling. but it looks like the judge made a finding that the judge made an effort this was just the prosecution had has already been made available to the defense. yeah. it sounds like a judge was concerned that all the other defendants would want to delay their trials by months, if not we are talking about four years worth of footage if you wanted him to end. so, it would have a sizable impact on moving the trial through the courts, or moving these cases through the courts. i do have to ask you about the point we find ourselves in, if we look at what the totality of the republican party is doing vis-à-vis january 6th. it now looks like it s not just an effort to undermine the efforts of democrats to hold those accountable accountable those in charge of the insurrection, if you will, accountable. it s become something much more nefarious, which looks like
movements inside the building would be exculpatory. do you think that the i mean, you are a lawyer. you know the body and you are not a judge. i understand that. but what is your expectation about people other than tucker carlson getting access to the footage? and specifically as it involves these defendants in these january 6th insurrectionists trials? well, there s something called a brady motion. and what that does is, it requires the prosecution to share with the defense all their evidence. and so any video that the prosecution has has to be shared with the defendant. now, in some cases, judges have said the defendant can have it because there s security concerns about releasing it publicly, the defendant can t release it for their defense but not disseminated. so, there s nothing that the prosecution has that hasn t been shared the brady motion scenario with the defense.