plate. that is your boiler plate, through your broiler played ou the window you have a blood poorly played case you have that will appoint life it is not everyone s life. it is not how elections around now, the real watergate ha bigger things, it obviously ha nixon in the white house as an incumbent, et cetera but i do think that the ke here, which they will presen to a jury, every crime, ever lie, every intent was about an election. and the cover-up. i m sorry. someone close to the investigation told me last wee that it is not about what he did out of the election is different the voters it is about the cover-up he di from inside the oval office. sign from inside the oval. every allegedly falsified
here s some of what trump s lawyers were saying today. there must be something besides what we have been talking about for the past four, five years there wasn t there s nothing. the indictment itself is boiler plate. it doesn t allege any federal crime, any strait crime that s been violated. doesn t allege what the false statement is, and it s really disappointing. i m going to do this as carefully as i can fact check number one, true, the written indictment does not specify what the enhancing crime is, which is why we quoted the current d.a. bragg explaining verbally what he says it is, and they can pursue this case as they see fit. that s one fact check two, false. if you think the sordid and often disturbing allegations enumerated in this statement of facts are boilerplate, then i don t know what kind of boiler
at 100 is your job to show up and express your view. they did. is it s important for any of us to be in a position of helping and right up in the corner on top is one book i wanted to mention, fahrenheit for 51. a good book to read if you can get a hold of what. it s bad. let s talk about, a lot of people who get these books band or her move to get them banned, their argument is maybe they haven t read some of these books. it seems to be boiler plate, it saves to be an attempt to keep your kids away from being exposed to start things, as opposed to looking at the other way, the empathy, they look at the experience that you read about that you didn t actually
i think, it s less than that of democrats to say, yeah, we are doing too much for ukraine. so, broadly speaking, the public is still there. but it could slide. and i think the worry of the white house is, over time, will people say, is this money better spent here at home versus abroad? this is a perennial argument, of course. i was struck by, actually, how little the president talked about foreign policy in the speech. aside from what you showed an aside from a sort of glancing mention of china with an illusion though, not even a direct mention of the balloon incident, that was it for foreign policy. and i think that s a calculation that this really is a reelection speech. that he is not speaking to the country about foreign policy because he doesn t think voters care all that much about it he s concerned about what is happening here at home and he s trying to make the case for a second term. but as a result, you heard very little about what he wants to do about it. this stateme