i think, it's less than that of democrats to say, yeah, we are doing too much for ukraine. so, broadly speaking, the public is still there. but it could slide. and i think the worry of the white house is, over time, will people say, is this money better spent here at home versus abroad? this is a perennial argument, of course. i was struck by, actually, how little the president talked about foreign policy in the speech. aside from what you showed an aside from a sort of glancing mention of china with an illusion -- though, not even a direct mention -- of the balloon incident, that was it for foreign policy. and i think that's a calculation that this really is a reelection speech. that he is not speaking to the country about foreign policy because he doesn't think voters care all that much about -- it he's concerned about what is happening here at home and he's trying to make the case for a second term. but as a result, you heard very little about what he wants to do about it. this statements about ukraine and china were boiler plate. they were things he has said before. we have no new policy regarding those. and the rest of the world went unmentioned. >> we actually have that glancing mention of the rising tensions between us and china.