national guardsman who released this classified information, you are not the party of national security anymore. and this again is another example of that. and i think that it will hurt them in the long run. i mean, jeremy, by design none of you are politicians, but jeremy, it takes democrats being willing to make this argument that the republican party under at least desantis and trump are running as anti-military candidates. i certainly think that they are running as anti-u.s. leadership in the world candidates. case in point is exactly their position on ukraine. exactly their position on nato. so ron desantis called ukraine a territorial dispute and then he had to of course clean up aisle 8 when even pointed out this was an autocratic government in putin, in russia, that was running roughshod over a democracy on the doorstep of nato. and that this was no mere territorial dispute.
and again how many people he excluded but who he did include in that circle, i mean there s real peril for him in here. again, we ll discard bill barr s uncertainty he faces grave criminal exposure and donald trump s defense you can do whatever with classified materials. take me down the center path, harry litman. what we have is a target of an investigation, right, who is describing the conduct of something within his authority. the criminal code is the criminal code. it s clearly not, but tell me if and of course jack smith could decide not to charge, not to prosecute. but if he decides to charge trump in this case, do you envision multiple acts of obstruction like we saw in the mueller report with the nexus to the crime and imagine underlying crimes as well? tell me when bill barr says he faces grave criminal exposure and the government has a strong case, what does he see?
judgment decision i mentioned. it was very important for not just dominion, but for staple street capital, who has been with dominion every single step of this way, to make sure that the record was set straight, that the world saw what we saw, that the world knew what we knew, via the documents and the briefings that we put together, and it was hugely, hugely important to us to get that ruling from the court that it is crystal clear that dominion had nothing to do with any bad activity in the 2020 presidential election. i can see your eyes light up still at the prospect of having of kind of the the lost opportunity in some way what it would have been like to litigate this case and there were people looking forward to watching it on tv. i kept thinking this is kind of a new trial of the century, combination of the o.j. trial and scopes trial, everybody would be watching this all at once and i guess, you know, for a lot of people there was a
what we see in the case with yarl in missouri is a story of an old white man who saw a black man on his porch and was decided because he was black you have the girls, the cheerleader, the guy comes out brandishing a weapon when these girls are in cheerleader outfits and they pulled into the wrong driveway and he has his gun out and firing at them look at the picture we showed on camera it s crazy try to diagnose what it is obviously, they are all armed. where is this paranoia the connection i want to make. this paranoia about crime that s foi pushed on by people pedaling this there s an information ecosystem that has been built over many years in this country. facilitated and enabled by politicians, republican politicians, to scare people to death. the example i give that you
neutral report to defamation law in the state of new york where fox is those things are not going to cut it and fox knows that from this court, and i if i were them, i would be very careful of making decisions based on those defenses in the future so as i said before, as you described the the last-minute, last-hour preparation in the war room where what was once the war room and where you signed i guess like the peace treaty, going into ahead what would have been the start of the trial yesterday, there s tantalizing kind of images that play out before your eyes of what might have been. you guys released a monster exhibit list, 7,000 pages, and i m curious without without going into, obviously, the individual piece of evidence that you were going to enter into court into the record in the case if it had gone forward i m curious if you can talk a little bit about what we might