their choice for the republican nomination and no longer the leader of the republican party and that s not the situation we re looking at right now. thank you for spending some time with us and you are now free, all do respect to president biden, free to leave delaware. when we come back after the historic three quarters of a billion dollar, with a b, settlement, there are still victims of election disinformation out there and we will talk with constitutional law scholar laurence tribe ability that and where we go from here. plus we re hearing from the fulton county district attorney in the form of a court filing today. first new detail since she warned the charging decisions are imminent in the ex-president s effort to overturn the 2020 election what we know, and it says about this monumental case and an ominous decision from the supreme court. the high court buying themselves more time around a case that will have huge consequences for women s reproductive health and freedom. w
state of iowa, not an unimportant state in presidential politics, i will note it says it will no longer pay for rape victims abortions or contraceptives, even though, according to the des moines register, 85% of iowans support access to abortion in case of rape or incest i ve covered politics for a long time i gotta say, it does raise a basic question what is going on with the republican party when it decides to continually get behind pieces of legislation and administrative rulings and regulations that 85% of their voters oppose? i think what we are going to see over the next year is that there is no abortion bantha is extreme enough in this race for the bottom we will see moran more bans. we will see more efforts to
georgia, and then the washington case the washington, d.c., case, under the special counsel. and that a lot of people thought the georgia indictments could be as fani willis said, imminent. it feels to me, again, i admit to being baffled by some of the legalese in here and taking a deep walk in the legal woods, but sounds to me on the basis of everything, yeah, she s on this case, she s focused on it, but the ways in which she s focused on it suggest this could take a while. we could be waiting for her this might be many, many or not just weeks but months before we get to a decision on whether there is going to be an sdooimts or not so maybe. and you re right, it s not about legalese she said, by that, i don t mean coming soon. it s an understandable confusion. a lot of people there s reason she will want all things being equal to bring an indictment at the beginning of a grand jury sitting that helps her potentially in
software, a backdoor is capable of flipping votes. they were being notified by smartmatic in frankfurther that biden was way behind and they better come up with more ballots and we can prove everything i said. so professor, it s been easily forgotten that in that period, that really dominion and smartmatic were as you heard, they were kind of like the twins out of the mouths of the conspiracy theorists on fox news, sydney powell and rudy giuliani and others. you only heard the name of dominion in smartmatic and vice versa, the two great say tans here that the big lie propagators cited and i wonder the large question here, which is, having had this kind of a settlement in the dominion case, how does that settlement, how does the specter of that settlement hover over the smartmatic case or does it
they are focused so much on the electors and yes, it s a food fight, but that s a food fight that prosecutors love. what it suggests is you can put on one elect tore, give him immunity and they will incull pate another this is a two tiered case, everything in georgia and the national figures it suggests where everybody, including a new grand jury coming in may when she will pull the trigger, there s work to be done if she wants to parcel out immunity to certain electors you have to debrief them, put them in front of a grand jury. there s the secondary kind of timing point that it suggests. yeah. harry, i will stick with you and draw that point out to put a fine point on it so to speak i think if you had asked people who follow trump s legal entanglements and challenges a couple months ago what likely sequence of indictments if there were going to be indictments would come, it was maine,