the votes of two states, and that alone would not have actually been enough to flip the election from biden to trump. this was mccarthy s attempt to appease the maga madness while also simultaneously being a responsible leader. and it s difficult to achieve, perhaps impossible, and it will be a task that will be far more difficult with the mighty powers of the speaker of the house instead of as leader of the minority. we hope the next speaker chooses why thusly. in a moment, an influential voice on the house gop will join us, congressman dan crenshaw from texas is hoping to become the chairman of the homeland security committee, if his party wins back control of congress. and he wins reelection in 12 days. first order of business, if achieved? we ll ask him next.
from our government to go to do those deals i ve questions about them individuals, james and hunter biden. kellyanne: to everyone s point, this is not politics as usual. there s nothing usual about what hunter biden dead. when he was promising access to the big guy, the guy was a medium guy and he s now a really big guy. he s president of the united states. we need to know what was done with government resources. he needs to fly around on air force to with his father and it we hear connections with ukraine and china. they are in the news every day. containing china is the most important thing that we can do national security rights. we need answers and when he told them to account. you cannot expect our commander in chief and president to do that if he was willing to live during the debate in 2021 when he was asked very squarely about hunter s dealings. he said there s nothing there and he lied. everybody covered up the hunter biden laptop appeared 70% of americans said they would ha
try to throw the election from biden to trump. that s no surprise. they re asking questions about trump. of course they are. to pete s point earlier, we think the january 6 committee is moving faster but that s because it s publicly and the justice department doesn t work that way. right. we worry and wonder if they move at all. of course they are. trump and the people around him within the scope of the investigation. the justice department didn t use this word. that makes them subject. someone within the scope. so you ask questions about the people. nothing about this should be surprising. some of this should be comforting to people thinking the justice department was doing nothing. i was never one of those people. i m not surprised they have a
tries to dig much into statements and conversations he had with trump, but, she may talk about other members of the inner circle and what statements were made. we know that the da is trying to cast a wide net here. and we know that we ve heard terms like rico, and this type of thing, and conspiracies, and she looked at other people. my guess is she would use these witnesses to see if she can actually connect the different parts of the tentacles of her case. and ultimately, give a pole to this grand jury, where they think that she should move forward, or a law criminal branch if there s an indictment. i will ask if there are the electors, real quick, the fulton 16 republicans were fake electors in georgia are targets in their investigation, what does this mean for these republicans? again, i expect just a lot of these individuals lawyer up
criminal probe to come before a grand jury. so certainly, there s some significance there. remember, with that subpoena that he has he tried to remove the federal law [inaudible] there will be some legal wrangling about what goes on whether there is a proper argument that should be, made and that type of thing. it ll be interesting to see if she can actually get into the inner workings of those meetings, and who was calling the shots. that s one thing that i think has been missing from the january 6th presentation, the committee s presentation. is that direct link to trump. we have a lot of other people, we have a lot of speculation, we have three hours and seven minutes, of not doing a lot, and people want to make a lot about throwing ketchup and plates against a wall, and arguing with secret service drivers, that s all fine and good. but when you want to charge somebody, especially former president with conduct that occurred while he was in is sitting president, then you better be