today and again i feel more anxious for our democracy than i did as i was escaping a tear gas chamber on january 6th. today, a significant chunk of the american population says it does not matter with trump or the attorney general or would any of trump s people said. what matters is of the donald trump continues to tell me that the election was stolen and that was good enough for me. that s not a condition that helps for maintenance of the democracy. that s a scary thought when you frame it like that. when you look at ahead sir, when the committee reconvenes in september, what do you think they should prioritize. where does it go from here? if there are any unanswered questions for you the would want the committee to address, what would they be? well, i can t help but observe that an awful lot of people who ultimately did the right thing i m thinking of all the witnesses came forward a lot later than they might have. they didn t come forward on january 7th to tell their
illegally reject votes and delay the proceedings. you know he tried to convince state officials and state legislators to flip their electoral votes from biden to trump. and you know donald trump tried to corrupt our department of justice to aid his scheme. but by january 6th, none of that had worked. only one thing with succeeding on the afternoon on january 6th. only one thing was achieving president trump s goal. the angry armed mob president trump sent to the capitol broke through security, invaded the capitol and force the vote counting to stop. that mob was violent and destructive, and many came armed. as you will hear, secret service agents protecting the vice president were exceptionally concerned about his safety and their own. republican leader kevin mccarthy was scared, as were others in congress. even those who themselves help to
discussion are not have not yet been publicly released. and if i were his attorney, i would certainly want to make sure that if there is any connection to the record, that he does it in the right way, so to speak. all right, paul rosen, spiked jill while banks, thank you for joining us this evening. a appreciate your legal analysis on all of this. after the break, for after the criminal investigation in georgia, that involves trump and his republican cronies. georgia, that involves trump aniv ity & gum gives us the dual action effect that really takes care of both our teeth sensitivity as well as our gum issues. there s no question it s something that i would recommend.
violence? today we address that issue. everything you have heard in these issue hearings thus far will help you understand president trump s motives during the violence. you already know donald trump s goal, to halt or delay congress official proceedings to count certified electoral votes. you know the donald trump tried to pressure his vice president to illegally reject votes and delay the proceedings. you know he tried to convince state officials and state legislators to flip their electoral votes from biden to trump. and you know donald trump tried to corrupt our department of justice to aid his scheme. but by january 6th, none of that had worked. only one thing with succeeding on the afternoon on january 6th. only one thing was achieving president trump s goal. the angry armed mob president trump sent to the capitol broke through security, invaded the
out of 100 the senators voted to convict president trump at that time, and more than 20 others said they were voting against conviction because the president s term had expired. at the time, the republican leader of the united states senate said this about donald trump. fix. senate said this about donald trum -. ., , senate said this about donald trum -. . ., , , senate said this about donald trum. , ., , trump. a mob. in his name. they were carrying trump. a mob. in his name. they were carrying his trump. a mob. in his name. they were carrying his banners. - were carrying his banners. chanting were carrying his banners. chanting his words and screaming their loyalty to him. inaudible. he was the only one. he reached the conclusion he was the only one. he reached the conclusion is he was the only one. he reached the conclusion is based - he was the only one. he reached the conclusion is based on - he was the only one. he reached the conclusion is based on what. the conclu