binding code of ethics at the supreme court, which will come as a shock to many people in this country. but there are there is a law requiring financial disclosure. and there is no way under any circumstance that he could have thought that taking a private jet for personal use in for his own personal errands, which was one of the several ways in which he used the private jet of this billionaire mega, don't republican mega donor would qualify as personal hospitality . and by the way, these are people he only met once he got on the bench, which is a whole separate issue as you consider whether someone is a real friend or someone is, you know, is trying to sort of exert influence over you. yeah, you know, i mean, this is not the first time where justice thomas in particular just seems to feel like he's not accountable to anybody. and part of the shame is on all of us because there are no binding rules governing the supreme court ethics. and you know, i think this if i had to compare this compared with, you know, his still sitting in cases where ginny thomas had a personal interest that feels even more egregious. i mean, this guy's committed so many