too far to the left on guns and some other issues and coal in order to still win the trump voter? yeah, chuck. even in that 2016 race, look, i ve besign gun-related bills a vetoed some of them. ultimately i think we need to start looking at this as a public health issue not just a political issue. when i was growing up as a kid, the nra was a gun safety and hunting organization. now it s nothing more than a political organization. if we were looking at this as a public health issue, gun owners want to make sure that guns don t end up in unlawful hands or used wrong. even they support universal background checks. i think that there is a lot more that can be done along the way, and over a fourth of the time that i ve been asked to lower flags both under this administration and the previous, it had to do with mass
transparentally taking an overt act in this conspiracy with russia to get elected in exchange for whatever his deal was with putin that they ll probably confirm in a couple of days when they ask each other what to do behind closed doors. this has been a conspiracy, it s a collusion, and explains why trump gave the false statement about the meeting was on june 9th. it was about adoptions of russian children. and you re bearing down on something that bill kristol and i have discussed before, which is that donald trump is sophisticated about his defense here and, bill, john is quoting from page 13 of this indictment, which says on june 8th, these russians launched d.c. leaks and used it to release stolen e-mails and he has pointed to the fact it was the next day, you had the trump tower meeting and that donald trump, we now know, has been exposed for interfering in a defense to the trump tower meeting, which he did not attend. and there s never been, bill, a very good besign signign exp
now, the besign interpretation of what occurred today is that perhaps these senators, and i don t sub prescribe to this, but i m going to say it, perhaps these senators were trying to send a message to donald trump. an intervention. maybe it was. he watches television and here is what these allies of his have said, that you haven t grabbed the you don t understand the character of the nation and that you need to grab this mantle of leadership. i believe they were being critical, but, you know, you could also say, look, maybe he s going to listen if we actually say it directly to the camera. i think it s kind of like a, you know, a hail mary in a way like we have to get out there and say this because it s what we believe and he needs to hear it from us. gloria david, hang on. we ll have more to discuss. but the president can disband as many presidential advisor panels
in terms of relative population there are more muslims in the united kingdom than in the united states. we have a population of 330 million. their population is smaller, 60, 70 million. they have a problem in dealing with the radicalization of young people. they really as onerous as it may be, they have to really enhance their own domestic security. they have to have sources within the community. i really believe that every major mosque, particularly where the preacher is someone who has a history of radicalized sermons has to really be plugged in, in a sense. look at the surveillance we have here against reporters, as besign as you could get. people doing their job. we have justice department and the fbi probing them, following them, sniffing down eric holder signed off on it. it is deeply distressing. it is the evidence of overkill. that s the kind of asset and those kinds of fbi probers of
statement over this alleged dinner early on in january prior to comey s march hearing where he confirmed there was a criminal investigation ongoing about collusion with russia and the trump campaign and its aide, before that, that s an inappropriate act if somebody s trying to throw their weight around and in an unethical fashion. fts it s after that march event you have somebody who knows there s an investigation, who s now insinuating that you may or may not be able to keep your job if the answer is yes, you are being investigated and it sounds more like the basis for him actually terminating him is based on that exchange. of course, we didn t get the dates of any of these conversations, uftsly. no. we don t know when that is. as this pendulum keeps going back and forth, erin, about whether or not this was a political motivation or a more besign explanation from rose